WTF?
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crim...sault-on-woman
Kumar pleaded guilty to aggravated burglary, intentionally causing grievous bodily harm, threatening to kill, assault with a weapon, assaulting a woman, and intimidation.
Judge Paul Kellar suppressed the victim's name and read Kumar the first of the three strike warnings for violent offenders.
The judge said the unprovoked attack was prolonged, painful, and extremely frightening, and the victim suffered long term emotional effects.
It was premeditated offending, and Kumar had planned for her to suffer a prolonged torture.
He said Kumar's ingrained views from his upbringing led to the offending.
So does he get another "go" before getting his third strike? What unfortunate victim has to be his second or third before ...well, before what? Can anyone explain what the consequences are if you're only a "first or second strike" offender of shit like this?
Bookmarks