Human microchip

[mossy1200]

Wonder if ill get a ticket every time I exceed 104kph. Licence be gone within a day.

This reminds me of the life time licence. Sold as one thing and replaced by another.

[Madness]

If they start chipping babies and migrants, from Jan 1, 2017. Everyone will be trackable by the year 2100.

Anyone still old enough not to have been chipped, can be sent off to the glue factory, including those playing the Cryogenics Joker card

[nzspokes]

Well I guess we've found our good obedient little citizen.

Edit: Fucked if I know how that G got in the heading.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s8wkijxBwk

[nzspokes]

I am prepared.

Swing away.

[Hemi Makutu]

& you do of course realize that every 'officially born' & 'registered child' - in NZ has had their DNA put on record..
...for like.. decades.. now...

[Akzle]

The fuck you babbling on about? Examples are required, all theory and working instances put read distance as a function of chip/coil size; one which does not support reading implants at anything over 100mm, if that.

was never going to read it. just wanted to cook you a bit.

[Akzle]

Wonder if ill get a ticket every time I exceed 104kph. Licence be gone within a day.

This reminds me of the life time licence. Sold as one thing and replaced by another.

only if you were stupid enough to give it back.
it was a legally enforcable contract between your person and teh jew overlords.

[TheDemonLord]

If you're suggesting you can't possibly imagine this technology being used for nefarious reasons, methinks you should fuck off to the dummy corner with bogan.

Yeah, Nah.

You should actually learn how the technology can work and would work before coming up with Nefarious theories.

As I said - Learn how encryption and authentication works first.

[Berries]

Edit: Fucked if I know how that G got in the heading.

Are you Hemi Makutu in disguise?

[Akzle]

g .

[Laava]

So who plans to line up like a good obedient little citizen?

http://yournewswire.com/dr-oz-microchips/

You might need a rabies shot with that too. Oh and a hanky to wipe away all the butthurt.

[Katman]

Oh and a hanky to wipe away all the butthurt.

That's lovely dear.

[Katman]

Yeah, Nah.

You should actually learn how the technology can work and would work before coming up with Nefarious theories.

As I said - Learn how encryption and authentication works first.

So where do you draw the line?

Somewhere between Read Only and Read/Write?

Or do you not have a line?

[TheDemonLord]

So where do you draw the line?

Somewhere between Read Only and Read/Write?

Or do you not have a line?

Do you even know what those mean? And then do you understand why you asking that question is retarded when talking about RFIDs?

I'll explain - I'm going to presume that as a business owner, you have a Bank account somewhere. With that Bank account currently, there will be a whole lot of data (Address, D.O.B, Financial history yadda yadda yadda - you get the point).

This is NOT stored on the RFID.

It would be stored were it is currently stored.

"But Demon! How does it access it then?"

Well - an RFID typically only carries up to 2 Kb of Data (which is 4096 characters worth of data) - there are plans for 4 Kb and 8 Kb RFIDs (which translates to 8192 and 16384 characters worth of data)

https://www.rfidjournal.com/faq/show?66

For some applications (such as a Pet Microchip) - this is enough space for basic info - Name, Vet, Address etc. but in terms of holding a complete history - the storage capacity isn't there. How it would most likely operate is that the RFID would contain 2 things - a Unique identifier and a Key.

If you use online banking - your username/account number/access number is your unique identifier and your password is your key. At the server end (not the RFID end) your unique identifier is mapped and your public certificate is mapped (Public certificate works like the lock, your private key - held on the RFID - unlocks the lock)

So no, the introduction of this wouldn't lead to big brother being able to get all your data - the Data stays where it is (at least with current technology and implementation methods - if the memory capacity increases and more reliable methods of reading/writing are developed - this may change.)

Same with the Medical records - these are held securely at the Hospital end, but the RFID provides the unique identifier to look up the data and the key to access it.

Could RFIDs be used for mass surveillance - depends on what you mean by surveillance - As Bogan correctly pointed out, these devices are very short range, as such have limitations. In terms of using them like an AT HOP card - they could be used to build up locations of where the RFID had been scanned, and then from analysing that Metadata, identify patterns etc. However this is not the 1984-esque scenario painted by the Tinfoil hat wearing site that you posted up.

Is there some risks - yes - but they are greatly exaggerated and misrepresented by the Article.

To answer your earlier question - would I adopt this technology? No I wouldn't.

The why (for me) is that if I had an RFID, someone with physical access to my body could gain access to my Data, whereas with a password (known only to me and in my memory) means that I can still consciously control access to my data.

[Akzle]

.

The why (for me) is that if I had an RFID, someone with physical access to my body could gain access to my Data, whereas with a password (known only to me and in my memory) means that I can still consciously control access to my data.

... until the party van turns up and hooks a car battery to your balls...