Feminists going full retard.

[Akzle]

Please keep it civil and stay on the discussion topic.

your not a fucking mod, faggot.

what a wannabe.

[Katman]

your not a fucking mod, faggot.

what a wannabe.

Go easy on him.

http://pad1.whstatic.com/images/thum...ams-Step-1.jpg

He can't get past Step 1.

[bogan]

your not a fucking mod, faggot.

what a wannabe.

Oops, wrong login

[jonbuoy]

what the fuck cunt

You've made at least 5 decent posts in a week. Something isn't right - there's a disturbance in the matrix.

PS - I love you too xx

[Katman]

Something isn't right - there's a disturbance in the matrix.

The mods have him running scared.

[Akzle]

You've made at least 5 decent posts in a week. Something isn't right - there's a disturbance in the matrix.

PS - I love you too xx

i've said it before. i am the epitome of correctness and awesomeness, and if you ever disagree, your wrong.

The mods have him running scared.

what the fuck cunt. i basically own the mods.

[WristTwister]

Yes it's all about biology, you know it should be immediately apparent the men are smarter than women.
Yes men act "stupid" but that's more to do with social conditioning.

The human brain is not the same as a whale brain.

it's not the size that counts, it's how you use it! Anyway, the obvious fallacy in the size arguement is that one man can have an IQ of 90 and another can have an IQ of 150 with brains the same size.

[yokel]

it's not the size that counts, it's how you use it! Anyway, the obvious fallacy in the size arguement is that one man can have an IQ of 90 and another can have an IQ of 150 with brains the same size.

So what you're saying is that not all men are created equal but women are equal to men?

[yokel]

Things are going to get a little bit weird.

[Akzle]

Things are going to get a little bit weird.

things are going to get a lot weird, if you're desperate to cling to outmoded societal "norms".

vive lá revolcione!

[WristTwister]

So what you're saying is that not all men are created equal but women are equal to men?

No it's not what I'm saying, I'm saying that "bigger brains are smarter" is not a true statement. There are more factors that determine IQ than brain size alone.

[Akzle]

. There are more factors that determine IQ than brain size alone.

such as whether there's a vagina connected directly to it?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vagus_nerve

[WristTwister]

The NatGeo article isn't just about transgender kids, in fact Avery Jackson (the child on the cover) is the only transgender child they feature.

A doctor in the field gives the best explanation of gender and sex, not some conspiracy theorist who thinks it's part of a globalist agenda.

[Indiana_Jones]

[TheDemonLord]

Not all of them, so it's a bit of both, at which point the analogy falls over.

Depending on your PoV, of course.

Which would simply be propagation of 3rdwave or extremists ones, the core of femenism remains about equality.

This is predicated on the notion that the actions of modern Feminists are inline with this Core value, and that this core value remains unchanged.

It is my contention that this is not the case.

There is no evidence that these vocal extremist feminists are the majority, all you've provided is anecdotes and a few crazy academics; this is completely inadequate.

At what point does it become adequate? I've discussed issues with numerous Feminists - I can count on one hand the ones who were reasonable. The 'few crazy academics' are sadly not the few, they are the Majority. 40 or so years ago, these were indeed the crazy and radical feminists, now - they are the mainstream feminists.

I can post up some more Academic Feminists doing some truly insane things in order to preserve their narrative. At what point do you concede that maybe there is a rotten core that has corrupted the ideology?

But not all of them would be IRA, just as not all feminists want inequality in their favor.

I don't doubt that not all want inequality in their favour. Some demonstrably do, the rest however either:

a: don't consider Men as having an issues (because Patriarchy and privledge)
b: Consider that Men do have issues, but Womens issues are clearly more important (because muh vagina)
c: accept that Men have issues but pay lip service to them or blame men entirely for them (because Feminism has never actively tried to shut down conferences about Male suicide rates....)

I've never said there was a pay gap. I took exception to your claim that women do not work as hard as men. Please refrain from these strawmen arguments.

When I say they don't work as hard - I mean that they work less hours, often take part time jobs, generally are absent from roles that have an intense physical element to it or a danger element to it.

This is not a Strawman - This was born about by my contention of one of the central tenants of Modern Feminism (The Wage Gap) is complete BS as it is presented by Feminism. That the claim that this 77c on the dollar is due to Sexism when in actuality it's due to life choices that women (on the majority) make vs Men.

The data shows that for women under 30, working the same hours, in the same field as men get (cue drum roll) paid the same. I did read an article that showed in some fields (especially those where Salary negotiation was common) that men tended to earn a little more - and this was theorized to be due to men being more aggressive negotiators.)

Good science (even social) can remove such bias.

When something like 70% of the social scientists describe their political leanings as Left wing, and you are dealing with political topics, it is almost impossible to remove that Bias, especially when dealing with subjects of Morality - essentially because the publishers a priori position is never validated. This is compounded when the peer reviewer (given the near 70% prevalence) is also likely to hold the same a priori position. This is the perfect example of an Academic Echo Chamber.

Article on this

Actual scientific paper on this.

The technical assessment is often just part of the process, after which you may be left with a number of applicants who are just as good as each other on paper.

I think you are stretching that very very thin, I can't think of 2 candidates who on paper were as good as each other, I can think of a few who were close, but when we did the tech assessment there was a very clear difference (which is why we do a Tech assessment)

Christ/Christianity has fragmentation of followers, despite being an organisation, based on a gospel. Feminism is based on a simple concept, the main parallel I see is that the extremists in both have lost site of the core ideals. Anyone pushing inequality does not deserve the feminist title, just as anyone pushing bigotry and hate does not deserve the christian one.

So we are back to the no true scotsman:

"They aren't a real feminist as they are pushing inequality"

Problem is that you have to reconcile the inequality being pushed in the name of Feminism, by prominent Academic Feminists, by cited Feminist Authors, by Pop-Feminists with large youtube followings, By Tumblrina Feminists.

Just like Islam - when you have 50% or more of UK Muslims saying that Homosexuality should be a Crime, is it not a reasonable position to say that Muslims have a problem with Homophobia?