2017 NZSBK Superbike Championship - on hold

[jellywrestler]

So everyone who hadn't crossed the line got points for sixth?



The restart rule is altered to read that 65% of a race must be completed. The fucking MNZ official at the hearing gave that as evidence for this appeal. How inept is this cunt if he can't read and also refers to the wrong rulebook?

and in some places is says 2/3rds which is another example of poor wording for what is a legal document.

[Drew]

no, any riders that dont finish lap 5 get placed in the order they finished lap 4,

That's as convoluted and stupid as it fucking gets. Particularly since Sloan finished lap 4 in the lead.

So what you cunts are doing a great job of illustrating, is that the results need to go back to the last completed lap.

Cheers

and in some places is says 2/3rds which is another example of poor wording for what is a legal document.

Mate, I wouldn't worry about it. The rate at which MNZ learn from their mistakes suggests that they aren't capable of tying their own friggin shoes.

[Grumph]

Mate, I wouldn't worry about it. The rate at which MNZ learn from their mistakes suggests that they aren't capable of tying their own friggin shoes.

Well I've said before on this thread that they're incapable of putting out the same rulebook 2 years running....

It needs to be proofread against one pre website and all the remit revisions entered - then password protected against alteration by unauthorised people.

[scott411]

That's as convoluted and stupid as it fucking gets. Particularly since Sloan finished lap 4 in the lead.

So what you cunts are doing a great job of illustrating, is that the results need to go back to the last completed lap.

Cheers


Mate, I wouldn't worry about it. The rate at which MNZ learn from their mistakes suggests that they aren't capable of tying their own friggin shoes.

I dont understand why you need to start calling people names, i am trying explaining the rules that you dont understand, if you think you can do a better job, be a MNZ official, theres not a long line to be one i assure you,

why you think they need to come back a lap? i think they should use the last recorded passing (the last passing of the finish line on most tracks, or if we get to the point where we have multiple loops in tracks, then the last loop they passed) as i said above, i think anyone that crashed should not be scored at all, i believe this as there is an advantage to be gained by causing a red flag, if you get a red flag you have a chance of points, if race continues you have none, why the fuck would you no lie there to get points,

the reason they go back to the last completed lap is that there is no way of knowing who was in front with out TV coverage (and remember these rules have to work for club days as well) , and in the case where riders are side by side when the red flag comes out, who decides in front, thats why you need to go back to where the last recorded passing was,

you seem to want to prove you need to go back a lap and a half, when clearly all the front group had passed a finish line, i have never seen the rule used that way, but to be fair, its not normally and issue that gets brought up,

[Drew]

I dont understand why you need to start calling people names, i am trying explaining the rules that you dont understand, if you think you can do a better job, be a MNZ official, theres not a long line to be one i assure you,

why you think they need to come back a lap? i think they should use the last recorded passing (the last passing of the finish line on most tracks, or if we get to the point where we have multiple loops in tracks, then the last loop they passed) as i said above, i think anyone that crashed should not be scored at all, i believe this as there is an advantage to be gained by causing a red flag, if you get a red flag you have a chance of points, if race continues you have none, why the fuck would you no lie there to get points,

the reason they go back to the last completed lap is that there is no way of knowing who was in front with out TV coverage (and remember these rules have to work for club days as well) , and in the case where riders are side by side when the red flag comes out, who decides in front, thats why you need to go back to where the last recorded passing was,

you seem to want to prove you need to go back a lap and a half, when clearly all the front group had passed a finish line, i have never seen the rule used that way, but to be fair, its not normally and issue that gets brought up,

I'm not calling people names. I refer to cunts as cunts all the time.

Nobody cares what you think the rules should be. Ya got that? Stop putting that in to the thread. We don't care.

Define 'the front group' for us.

Do you think that the points battles other people are having is less important? The reason that it goes back to the last completed lap is so that it's fair for all.

This rule is picked at by dicks all the time. Usually noobs to racing that think they know better than everyone. Marcus made a whole song and dance about it, and we all know how big a fuckwit that cock is.

[scott411]

I'm not calling people names. I refer to cunts as cunts all the time.

Nobody cares what you think the rules should be. Ya got that? Stop putting that in to the thread. We don't care.

Define 'the front group' for us.

Do you think that the points battles other people are having is less important? The reason that it goes back to the last completed lap is so that it's fair for all.

This rule is picked at by dicks all the time. Usually noobs to racing that think they know better than everyone. Marcus made a whole song and dance about it, and we all know how big a fuckwit that cock is.

had a MNZ race licence since 1987, and been a steward since the mid 90's, so far from new here, I know the rule book better than most, mainly cause i have read it, which to most racers don't do, which to me, spending that much money on racing, and not reading the rules is a bit stupid,

i explained the rules to you, but since you dont seem to want to take my explanation, and since i explained them to Choppa as well, i seem to be a good fucken choice of people who want to know, again, how many meetings have you officiated at?

for your question the front group in my opinion is the other 5 super bikes that were in the race,

[Drew]

I did say usually a noob. I know you've been around a while.

You don't seem to know the rules though. You continually interject with opinion and don't quote the rules. But that's par for the course.

I've never been an official at a meeting. Very much doubt I ever would. I pay my fees when I'm gonna race, and I go race.

[Crasherfromwayback]

Think it's time to let it go Drew. The right guy won the title...whether you like the rules or not.

[Drew]

Think it's time to let it go Drew. The right guy won the title...whether you like the rules or not.

Whatever Pete. I'm not really vested in it at all, so matters not to me what way it goes.

However. If you read Sloan's submission (someone should since the useless fucking officials admit they didn't) the rules are quite clear.

But fuck it, this Scott cunt is like most other MNZ tards.

[Crasherfromwayback]

Whatever Pete. I'm not really vested in it at all, so matters not to me what way it goes.



But fuck it, this Scott cunt is like most other MNZ tards.

Sure looks like you have.

Nah, Scott knows his shit mate.

[Drew]

Sure looks like you have.

Nah, Scott knows his shit mate.

Fuck it. I can't seem to have an opinion because I know Sloan and I'm too stupid to have come to it by myself.

[Crasherfromwayback]

Fuck it. I can't seem to have an opinion because I know Sloan and I'm too stupid to have come to it by myself.

You seem to have no problem having one, neither do I. Just because we don't agree on each others doesn't make them wrong either. We did you become such a cry baby?

[Drew]

You seem to have no problem having one, neither do I. Just because we don't agree on each others doesn't make them wrong either. We did you become such a cry baby?

Hahahaha. Gotta spread more rep. That's problematic because you and Trustrum (I dunno if that's how to spell his name actually), are the only cunts I remember giving rep to.

[sidecar bob]

Whatever Pete. I'm not really vested in it at all, so matters not to me what way it goes.

However. If you read Sloan's submission (someone should since the useless fucking officials admit they didn't) the rules are quite clear.

But fuck it, this Scott cunt is like most other MNZ tards.

To be fair, this Scott cunt is a fairly good cunt.
I have to work next door to the cunt every day & you could definitely have worse cunts for a neighbour.

[Drew]

To be fair, this Scott cunt is a fairly good cunt.
I have to work next door to the cunt every day & you could definitely have worse cunts for a neighbour.

Sounds like every other MNZ tard to me. But if you and Pete both have time for him, he must be alright.