The 2017 Election Thread

[Graystone]

Already done that.
Multiple times.



Look at my previous posts.

Problem is, you've explicitly stated you are ignoring the evidence I post.

If you genuinely want proof, look back at my previous posts.

If you instead want to grandstand, then continue as you are.

Citation needed. Stop obfuscating thee evidence you claim to have.

[Swoop]

...the slaves stood against it (on the principal.

Damn. If I knew that standing on the head of the school would have freed all of the pupils...

Revolution!!!
Emancipation in the classrooms!

[Graystone]

So, you are saying that people aren't equal, and that the slaves needed other people to first make the rational argument, then the legal one, then finally someone to back up the law with Force.

So as you demonstrate, it's irrational to think of people as equal, but it's right to treat them as equal.

Oops. There goes your semantic quibbles. Again.

No, I'm saying there is strength in numbers.

[Graystone]

Damn. If I knew that standing on the head of the school would have freed all of the pupils...

Revolution!!!
Emancipation in the classrooms!

That's just a sneak peak of what's to come...

[TheDemonLord]

Citation needed. Stop obfuscating thee evidence you claim to have.

Scroll up - there's the citation.

I'm not obfuscating - it's in this thread, in the manner which you've prescribed.

Problem is, you've systematically refused to look at it, preferring to call me names.

Now, if you are genuine - you'd look at what has already been provided.

If you are disingenuous, then you'll ignore all proof then claim it was never prese....

Oh wait....

[Graystone]

Scroll up - there's the citation.

I'm not obfuscating - it's in this thread, in the manner which you've prescribed.

Problem is, you've systematically refused to look at it, preferring to call me names.

Now, if you are genuine - you'd look at what has already been provided.

If you are disingenuous, then you'll ignore all proof then claim it was never prese....

Oh wait....

Not how science goes, citations are put where they are required, you never refer to another citation instead of the reference directly.

Show me one time I've called you names.

[TheDemonLord]

No, I'm saying there is strength in numbers.

Certainly in a physical confrontation - but a single person, with a single coherent, irrefutable argument is the catalyst for change.

And because people aren't equal only a select few get to be that one person.

[Graystone]

Certainly in a physical confrontation - but a single person, with a single coherent, irrefutable argument is the catalyst for change.

And because people aren't equal only a select few get to be that one person.

So do the semantics thing and think of it like I've been catalysed, now there is strength in numbers as everyone is equal.

The one is an individual who is judged on their individual merits, obviously. These contrived examples just show how futile your point really is

[TheDemonLord]

Not how science goes, citations are put where they are required,
.

And I have done so.

you never refer to another citation instead of the reference directly.

I'm not doing that. I'm saying look at what has already been given.

Show me one time I've called you names.

Let's start with all those Ad Hominems.

[TheDemonLord]

The only bias is in your perception and interpretation.

That would be projection....

[Graystone]

And I have done so.



I'm not doing that. I'm saying look at what has already been given.



Let's start with all those Ad Hominems.

Whereabouts?

[TheDemonLord]

Whereabouts?

Scroll up.

[Graystone]

Scroll up.

None there, which post?

[TheDemonLord]

So do the semantics thing and think of it like I've been catalysed, now there is strength in numbers as everyone is equal.

No, you are the one who needs to play semantics.

Do I need to cite the Pareto distribution at you to show why you collorary is:

A: Not valid
B: is a Non-sequitur.

The one is an individual who is judged on their individual merits, obviously. These contrived examples just show how futile your point really is

The only contriving, is your attempts to backflip out of the logical corner:

Either everyone is equal, so there is no requirement to provide any assistance
or
Not everyone is equal and therefore I'm right.

[TheDemonLord]

None there, which post?

Try page 107.

That's as far as I can be arsed, considered how deliberately disingenuous you are being.

Scroll up was meant a little more metaphorically....