Sexual abuse, let's do this! then try to cover it up
Hypocrisy anyone?
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=11882660
Mate, we voted for an outfit that pulls this shit: https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/pol...rseas-students , "because integrity", nothing surprises me.
Oh wait... That's right, we didn't.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
I wonder if Winnie is shitting about having to back up Britain, in the Russian assassinations debacle.
Labour attempting to hide the sexual abuse scandal here? Poorly done.
International investors, who became NZ citizens, threatening to pull out due to liarbour's immigration change of policy.
Coalition getting shaky yet?
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Jacinda looks so hot when she's angry![]()
Cover up, from what i understand the alleged victims were encouraged and asked if they wanted te police involved they by all accounts declined.
Contrast this with the secret payments dismissles and huge payouts made during the Barclay cover up.
National allowed Barclay to lie in statements and to avoid taslking to the police.
National and Bil English made sure the victim lost their job, then sanctioned the hush money payout to shut up the victim , then claimed he did not know details, Refused to make Bracay front to police or punish Barclay in anyway at all.Barclay denied to members of his electorate there had been recording of Dickson, and about being approached by police.
- English knew Dickson had been recorded by Barclay and spoke to her about it, despite telling media he had not been directly involved in any discussions.
- Then-Prime Minister John Key’s parliamentary budget was used to pay part of a confidential settlement to Dickson, in an attempt to avoid “potential legal action”.
- Dickson and others in the electorate have been threatened and intimidated by others since falling out with Barclay.
Police investigating the case received a range of evidence, including a text exchange from English to electorate chair Stuart Davie which said Barclay had recorded Dickson.
On January 18, 2016, the Parlimentary Service sent representatives from Wellington to meet Dickson and discuss her and another staff member's concerns. At the end of the meeting she was told the MP had lost confidence in her.
Dickson offered to resign immediately but was put on paid leave and told to think it over.
The texts also reveal Dickson’s “settlement was larger than normal because of the privacy breach” and had to be “part paid from the Prime Minister’s budget to avoid potential legal action”
Contrast this with Labours banning of the alleged perpetrator from all further events.
I think you will find that in the Ponytail pulling Incidents that the National prime Minister was in fact the Person that was doing the unwanted touching, He had also previously been asked to stop.
Where as what is now being alleged the Labour PM was not even aware what at occured.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
Who said it was a cover up? So they didn't tell the media - so what? Not telling the media is hardly a cover up ...
What about the victims? Are they worried they might be exposed in this?
The girls were 16 - under our privacy laws the party is not obliged to tell anyone IF the girls said they didn't want to take it any further ...
The Labour Party is not a public organisation, nor is it publically funded - they are voluntary members of a party and pay party fees ... the party is separate from the caucus and this is a party matter, not a caucus matter
The party organised the camp - not the caucus .. why are you all trying to hold politicians responsible for something they were not responsible for ?
The alleged attacker is not a party member - what you all going to say if it turns out he is a member of the national party
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks