The 2017 Election Thread

[Katman]

Why? You stated something that wasn't true and I pointed that out.

TDL made the statement that there is no reward without risk - to which I replied "what about an inheritance".

What the fuck has that got to do with inheritance tax, shitforbrains?

[husaberg]

TDL made the statement that there is no reward without risk - to which I replied "what about an inheritance".

What the fuck has that got to do with inheritance tax, shitforbrains?

No risk with inheritence, some might point out that there is a risk that you might be disinherited Stevo.

[Swoop]

What the fuck has that got to do with inheritance tax, shitforbrains?

Your statements of profits, capital, depreciation and capital gains, immediately beforehand, related to a monetary and financial discussion.
Cocksucker.

[Katman]

Your statements of profits, capital, depreciation and capital gains, immediately beforehand, related to a monetary and financial discussion.
Cocksucker.

My reply was solely to the claim that there is no reward without risk.

It had nothing to do with profits, capital, depreciation or capital gains, shitforbrains.

[Swoop]

My reply was solely to the claim that there is no reward without risk.

It had nothing to do with profits, capital, depreciation or capital gains, shitforbrains.

"Context".

Another word lacking from your command of English. As I said, your ability to change tack and fuck off in whatever direction your lonely braincell chooses.

[Katman]

"Context".

Another word lacking from your command of English. As I said, your ability to change tack and fuck off in whatever direction your lonely braincell chooses.

Seriously shitforbrains, there's no ambiguity in it.

It was one sentence followed by a one sentence reply.

It doesn't surprise me that you're struggling to get your head around it though.

[Swoop]

Seriously shitforbrains, there's no ambiguity in it.

It was one sentence followed by a one sentence reply.

It doesn't surprise me that you're struggling to get your head around it though.

I guess that's as close as anyone gets to an apology from you.

[Katman]

I guess that's as close as anyone gets to an apology from you.

Refer post #2292.

[sidecar bob]

Cool, glad I don't live in New Plymouth right now. That's fucked. Thanks Govt.

[jasonu]

Cool, glad I don't live in New Plymouth right now. That's fucked. Thanks Govt.

pretty much.

[Katman]

Cool, glad I don't live in New Plymouth right now.

I've been saying that for years.

[husaberg]

Cool, glad I don't live in New Plymouth right now. That's fucked. Thanks Govt.

You might wish to check out the regional GDP it was already screwed over by National. Long before Labour came to power.

[sidecar bob]

You might wish to check out the regional GDP it was already screwed over by National. Long before Labour came to power.

Oh cool, another reason why its not labours fault.

[sidecar bob]

You might wish to check out the regional GDP it was already screwed over by National. Long before Labour came to power.

Oh cool, another reason why its not labours fault.
Don't you think they should be doing something to make it better, not worse?

[husaberg]

Oh cool, another reason why its not labours fault.
Don't you think they should be doing something to make it better, not worse?

You mean like what National did for the West Coast when they forced a SOE to borrow money to buy a Lemon (Pike) then borrow huge amount's pay to pay them a dividend.appointed a stupid board that forced them to try stuff outside their core bussiness, Thus forcing them into insolvency, then failed to bail them out like they did for a rich overseas multinational (Rio Tinto in southland) which resulted in the loss of about 1500 of 100K plus a year jobs in a population of 30,000 people.