I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Just as all right wing dictatorships end well?
All governments that suffer from corruption fail whether left or right wing.
What democracy does russia have now? is it right wing or left
they hold elections like Zimbabwe does but there can be only one winner.
The state might not own the factories and companies but is a closed shop of friends of the state who own and control everything including the media.
its almost like Russia ended up the total right wing ideal where the rich few control everything and there is no middle class,
Is that not the right wing nirvana.
Nor does it end where the only food is MacDonalds the currency is a big mac and everyone ends up somehow working for MacDonalds on a farm, factory, bakery or delivery driver for MacDonalds.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Another total fuckwit. The damage he could do to the UK is unimaginable.
Isn't it odd that China and Russia - other "external forces" - are walking away from this? China is trying to get its "loans" back without collapsing the entire country (challenging, at best).
Nope. They fucked it all up on their own.
Socialism promotes capitalism, just look at the GREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED of the dictators.
The peasant classes get to suffer at the hands of the socialist oppressors.
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
That's just stupid.
Exactly. It's a failure of capitalism. Glad you agree.Originally Posted by Swoop
Exactly again. Socialism promotes capitalism. It's a failure of capitalism. After all, if Venezuela hadn't have been involved in the fall in oil price, they wouldn't have had to print money to deal with the shortfall. Money money money = capitalism.Originally Posted by Swoop
Go on, spin me another.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Wrong. Socialsts' are humans who like to "have stuff" (food and clothes are high on their list, but that's another issue) so when they crawl up the ladder ("but everyone is equa"l I hear you call, even though Stalin states "some are more equal than others") they want things.
That is a failure of socialism. Not only to provide the essentials of life, but privileges as well.
So. Socialism = failure.
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Any governing ideology can damage capitalism, it's not a governing system, it's a production system. The outfit least likely to parasitise that productive system are libertarians. Minimum govt, minimum interference with personal choice and personal responsibility.
But, y'know, every looser deserves their share of the loot, eh?
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Of course it's a governing system. Budget Constraint. lol@parasites. Earth Overshoot sees BAU consume 1 years worth of sustainable resource every 7 months. But by all means keep crying about how much power government should and shouldn't have. Capitalism is mathematically doomed to failure. All capitalists are parasites according to the data/evidence/facts/proof/direct observation/trends/forecasts etc... but yeah, keep on "earning" your way to death and justifying your contribution to the highly evidenced destruction of the planet.
S'ok... you can close the other eye and it'll all go away.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks