Not sure what you think is/was so positive about your post regarding what Aussies wankers had to say sorry mate? And like I said, not like they haven't had FIVE diff PM's in 5 fucking years! Hardly makes them the best to comment on our state of affairs eh?
I'll def have a good day too. I've had an xtra spring in my step since Thurs night.
Interesting little charade by Winston - it doesn't really matter who is the government anyway!
Unless they take back control of the monetary system - they will just do a variation of the same old same old! (like shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic!)
Time will reveal all and they have a little under three years left - interesting if nothing else!![]()
I still don't get how you come to the conclusions about me that you do. I found the Aussie headline highly amusing, that's all. I wasn't making a statement. No idea you could see how what I said about the coalition partners, having to compromise to get bills passed, as being anything but positive. Agree about change being over due.
BUT it would have been nicer if the country got the chance to vote for what they are actually getting:
I guess we'll have to disagree on that one
Happy for you that you have a spring in your step![]()
From a business perspective most of the customers we have preferred to have kept the status quo.
boring yes but no surprises there.
general slowing down now while they wait to see economic direction.![]()
READ AND UDESTAND
Not my attachment, not my words or my opinion, just an alternative perspective.
Agree it's laughable, that's why I posted it.
I don't like or agree with MMP. No law against it (yet).
Nats shat on WP, last time around, from a great height. This is payback time for the old codger and also his swan song.
I enjoy politics and find it an entertaining subject. That's my right and privilege.
If I can get free tuition fees for the first year, I just might go and do a further education course. Always fancied being called 'Dr'![]()
Because I strongly believe that the role of an MP needs to be done by someone elected by the people.
Too many PC academic twats (in all parties) get to be MPs and speak for their party and not the people. I don't agree that the party should be able to decide, as this lacks transparency, and can be used to promote hidden agendas.
On the flip side, 3 years isn't long enough to change anything for the good and they can be just as quickly booted out.
Going for a ride now.
TTFN.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks