Originally Posted by
rastuscat
In my previous occupation I had the chance to check against a calibrated standard.
In the distant past speedos were considered measuring instruments. The generally accepted metrological standards for such particular instruments was, (among other things) an accuracy requirement expressed in +/- % of span, (total range measured). So your Smiths instrument of mid last century was likely to be required to be accurate to +/- 5%.
But. Some ravening socialist Euro bureaucrat noticed that this meant that a speedo COULD read less than actual, allowing the completely unsuspecting driver to EXCEED THE SPEED LIMIT!!!
By up to 2 1/2 MPH!!!
WITH COMPLETE IMPUNITY!!!
Now as we all know that's a certain death sentence. Not to mention a red rag to that particular flavour of bureaucratic bull. So the the merely scientific requirements were arseholed in favour of a far more regulatory set of... regulations. All speedos now had to be "accurate" to +zero/- [some irrelevant number buried in the reg's and mostly untraceable].
Also, car makers aren't silly enough not to notice that their clients are. Silly. In particular they noticed that they sell more cars if the speedo reads at least seven times the legal speed limit and at least three times what the vehicle is capable of achieving, short of a full compliment of JATO rockets. Ideally, from the perspective of a car market annalist's point of view the speedo should be carefully callibrated such that the local speed limit is sufficient to jjuuuuust make the needle jiggle around a bit, but only in order to indicate that the client is, in fact moving and, in theory should maybe pay some attention to shit.
The combined result of these stunning examples of governmental failure to mind their own fucking business resulted in speedos that don't actually tell you what speed you're doing. Which would be a complete disaster if any of us actually read them.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Bookmarks