I agree that the Locals aren't particularly keen on them (yet, I don't see anyone calling the Papua New Guineans Racist Xenophobes... Funny that... Guess it's only ol' Whitey that can be racist and Xenophobic...) - but as part of the deal they had the choice of "Another country" - that wasn't Australia.
They didn't take up this offer. This then begs the question, why not?
If you are a genuine refugee, fleeing for your life, then surely being offered a country that is on an equal economic footing as the one you came from, but in a state of peace is all that you require.
If, howver, you reject that - the implication is that you are moving not because you are scared for your life - but because you want something better.
If you are migrating because you want something better - you're an Economic Migrant.
What Australia did - I don't 100% agree with, however, seeing the fallout from Angele Merkles policies - I take it as the lesser of 2 evils. It sent a clear message that arriving in a leaky boat, with a sob story wasn't going to automatically grant you entry - and we didn't see the waves of migrants after that incident, that we did in Europe.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Yes... The actions of the Migrants - they didn't want to go to another country, they wanted to go to Australia.
As soon as you turn down a safe country, and indicate a preference for one specific country, especially when that country is First world with desirable living conditions - you aren't a refugee, you're an economic Migrant.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks