Like I said. Vexatious to the soul...
Like I said. Vexatious to the soul...
Nope. Quite the opposite. Someone following too close ... pull over and let them pass. If you are too close to the one in front ... slow for a bit and give them more room then resume your speed to match theirs until you can overtake safely (speed limits permitting). If oncoming traffic is close to the centerline ... move a bit to your left (in your lane).
When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
You'd have to be soft in the head to believe that. In Britain,where they drive on the same side of the road as us, and which is a similar society, although the roads may be busier, speed is ranked seventh as a cause of accidents. I don't know, but strongly suspect, that the Police here do not even consider the other potential causes.
When I hear a police spokesperson after a bad weekend parrot, "speed and alcohol were factors" I wonder what the other factors were. Like perhaps any of the six that rank higher than speed in Britain?
If I was being polite I'd suggest the police need training.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
The thing is ... the accident rate wont drop ... just the severity of the result of those accidents.
Penalties for causing an injury accident are the same ... regardless of the speeds involved. Although you might be less likely to get a dangerous driving charge (as opposed to a mere careless driving charge) at lower speeds (Still possible though).
Closer distances apart at slower speeds will still mean not a lot of time to avoid a collision when push comes to shove ... (pun intended)
However ... even at the slower speeds ... it is still highly likely that motorcyclists will still die in some accidents.
Feeling lucky ... ???
When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
Feel free to shout as loud as you will, no bother to me. After all, it's your record player that just keeps playing the same old tune.
The amusing thing remains that it's not about a riding school at all, it's about using an open minded approach to riding. Nobody ever suggested using advanced rider training would make a rider infallible, that's just how you choose to interpret it.
But hey, we'll happily keep calling your bullshit out for what it is, after all it's not like your skills have been weighed and measured against an international standard.
Ok I'll elaborate. So some of us on here have partaken in Advanced Rider training, just so happens to be done by an international organisation, using a recognized approach. But by all means twist what I said to suit your deluded way of thinking. The tourist driver problem is real, just a shame the media blow it out of proportion. Our local drivers are pretty damn shocking too, just not enough noise made about it.
The simplest approach one can make to improving road safety is to become the best driver/rider one can be. Backed up by meaningful enforcement. Engineering solutions in the form of safer roads, safer cars, lower speeds etc are easier to sell to Joe Public than making them do a defensive driving course though. Here it turns into a political problem.
Whenever I take a prospective driver for our trucking outfit for a test drive, I do a casual walk around of the car he/she rolled up in. It tells an interesting story...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks