Tommy Robinson

[husaberg]

Like I've already said, the fact that Tommy Robinson is heard repeatedly asking the police if it's ok to film from where he's standing suggests that he wasn't fully aware of the restrictions.

Yeah right........ yet when he did the exact same thing last year and was arrested and charged, this time he thought it might be okay.......Nice one

Last year Robinson was given a suspended sentence for committing contempt during a rape trial in Canterbury, after he attempted to film the defendants. He had been told that he would go to prison if he broke the law again.

[Katman]

Yeah right........ yet when he did the exact same thing last year and was arrested and charged, this time he thought it might be okay.......Nice one

Considering that numerous people were reporting on a previous similar trial in much the same manner and received no censure for it, you might just be right.

[husaberg]

Considering that numerous people were reporting on a previous similar trial in much the same manner and received no censure for it, you might just be right.

There you go again, while they were filming, they were not publishing the films, the details, names or faces or pictures or charges or calling them rapists. Only AKA was live streaming, but don't let that get in the way of your conspiracy story.
Like i have said he was warned he was convicted and received a suspended sentence, Yet he did it anyway, He is therefore stupid.

[Katman]

There you go again, while they were filming, they were not publishing the films, the details, names or faces or pictures or charges or calling them rapists.

Really?

Have you not seen the video of the Sikh reporter who was doing almost exactly the same thing outside the previous trial?

[husaberg]

Really?

Have you not seen the video of the Sikh reporter who was doing almost exactly the same thing outside the previous trial?

The previous trial you say now. classic katspam bait and switch.

[Katman]

The previous trial you say now. classic katspam bait and switch

Have another read of post #347.

(Nice edit by the way).

[husaberg]

Have another read of post #347.

(Nice edit by the way).

filming outside the court is not the issue plenty of real reporters were also doing this, live publishing the film and naming and calling the accused rapists is the issue.
Are you really that taken in with your latest conspiracy that you cant actually fathom that.

he was allowed to publish and post the film of the defendants after the court case as other did.
But he was too stupid to wait until the trial concluded, he was well aware of the media ban in place at the time , for him to suggest otherwise proves hes an idiot.
No one else was live streaming the anything about the proceedings, only him. filming outside the court wasn't an issue publishing it when he did was
He knew he wasn't allowed to film inside the court though and he did that as well.

There you go again, while they were filming, they were not publishing the films, the details, names or faces or pictures or charges or calling them rapists. Only AKA was live streaming, but don't let that get in the way of your conspiracy story.
Like i have said he was warned he was convicted and received a suspended sentence, Yet he did it anyway, He is therefore stupid.

unless you can prove the alleged other reporter was calling the accused rapists, live streaming, naming them and was not arrested for doing so, then went out and then done it again. exactly what do you have?

[Katman]

filming outside the court is not the issue plenty of real reporters were also doing this, live publishing the film and naming and calling the accused rapists is the issue.

The Sikh reporter certainly named all the accused at the trial he was covering.

And Tommy Robinson was very specific in referring to the accused as 'alleged' rapists.

[husaberg]

The Sikh reporter certainly named all the accused at the trial he was covering.

And Tommy Robinson was very specific in referring to the accused as 'alleged' rapists.

Wow more edited highlights again did the alleged Sikh reporter publish and then then get halled before the courts only to do it again.

lets be clear what was actually said by AKA.

n sentencing him on 26 May 2017, Judge Heather Norton said:

This is not about free speech… not about the freedom of the Press, nor about legitimate journalism, and not about political correctness. It is about justice and ensuring that a trial can be carried out justly and fairly..it’s about being innocent until proven guilty. It is about preserving the integrity of the jury to continue without people being intimidated..or being affected by irresponsible and inaccurate “reporting”, if that’s what it was.

…You made it abundantly clear that your mission was to film the defendants, who you referred to by their religion, as ‘Muslim child rapists’ and ‘Muslim paedophiles’.

…I take a very dim view of your conduct, which was in the face of repeated warnings…There are notices all over the court building making it clear that filming or taking a photograph was an offence and may be a contempt of court. You were told very clearly by the security staff at this court that you were to stop filming.

Yet although he was on a suspended sentence what did he do again................

A year later, on 25 May 2018, Robinson showed up outside Leeds Crown Court in the northern English county of Yorkshire and began broadcasting a Facebook Live video.

In the video, Robinson confronted men whom he presented as defendants in an ongoing child sexual abuse case, made it clear it was his aim to identify them and show their faces on camera, named several men and listed the purported charges against them, and in one instance encouraged the “mainstream media” to harass a man he had earlier shown on camera, as he arrived in court.

According to the Hull Daily Mail, some of the charges Robinson associated with named defendants were inaccurate. That type of factual error — broadcast to a potentially huge audience — could have serious consequences in a criminal trial. During the course of the 75-minute video, Robinson openly declared “there is a reporting restriction on this case,” acknowledged that he was already on a suspended sentence for contempt of court and said “I have to be super-careful.”

Judge Marson watched the Facebook video in court before telling Robinson:
No one could possibly conclude that it [the video] would be anything other than highly prejudicial to the defendants in the trial. I respect everyone’s right to free speech. That’s one of the most important rights that we have. With those rights come responsibilities. The responsibility to exercise that freedom of speech within the law. I am not sure you appreciate the potential consequence of what you have done.

…You have to understand we are not preventing publication. We are postponing publication to ensure that the trial is fair.

[Kickaha]

But he was too stupid to wait until the trial concluded, he was well aware of the media ban in place at the time , for him to suggest otherwise proves hes an idiot.

If his main aim was publicity which he got shitloads more than he would of if he hadn't been arrested then he wasn't stupid at all

[Katman]

If his main aim was publicity which he got shitloads more than he would of if he hadn't been arrested then he wasn't stupid at all

I'm sure his main aim was publicity - although not for himself but rather for the cause that he's protesting about.

I'm still not sure he was fully aware of the level of censure that he stood to receive though.

I don't really think Tommy Robinson was planning to offer himself up to Martyrdom.

[pritch]

In case anybody is tired of uninformed drivel and would like a rational, dispassionate, and informed, appraisal of the situation? OK I kniow it's KB but...

http://barristerblogger.com/2018/07/...son/#more-2627

[Katman]

http://barristerblogger.com/2018/07/...son/#more-2627

Well I suppose it beats a Mills and Boon story.

[husaberg]

If his main aim was publicity which he got shitloads more than he would of if he hadn't been arrested then he wasn't stupid at all

Don't you go offering up him as a martyr, its bad enough seesing Katspams posts worshiping him, the AKA is a bit thick.
AKA's turned it into being about himself rather then the sexual abuse of hundreds of kids, they are the victims.
What he did was nothing to do with the victims, if you listen to the victims they don't want a bar of AKA or his hate speech.

In case anybody is tired of uninformed drivel and would like a rational, dispassionate, and informed, appraisal of the situation? OK I kniow it's KB but...

http://barristerblogger.com/2018/07/...son/#more-2627

Nice link so Tommy is not appealing the decision only the length of the sentence yet hes still trying to raise funds "for his family".......

[Katman]

http://barristerblogger.com/2018/07/...son/#more-2627

Interestingly, the Pump Court Chambers website describes Matthew Scott on his profile page as "A specialist criminal advocate with considerable expertise in defending allegations of rape and child cruelty".

Now with all due respect to Matthew Scott, I'm well aware that even the most vicious of criminals have the right to a defence counsel, but it does give an insight into the level of contempt that he obviously has for Tommy Robinson.

Matthew Scott probably wishes he had been in that court that day defending those 'alleged' rapists.