Free speech.

[carbonhed]

I agree that things look separatist now in the name of inclusion. Yes, that sentence is really contradictory. But if we dont all make special effort to get minorities involved, the outcome is worse.

I truly believe in total equality. I think the world would be a better place with no borders, acceptance should be unequivocal for all walks of life....and then I get stuck.

Both sides of the coin on which I'm stuck:

Alcohol is a mainstream addictive substance. Accepted by nearly all as a right of choice.

Meth on the other hand, is widely referred to with the same reaction as Hitler supporting.

I like meth. Had a few good shindigs with like minded folk who 'light a bowl' every now and again, to enhance the experience of enjoying each other's company and dropping inhibition.

So why cant I do it legally? We make up the majority of people who have imbibed. We dont hurt anyone, and we certainly don't do it when we have responsibilities in the next 48 hours.

Flip side to that, kiddy fiddlers prolly feel the same way. If we can accept LBGQT (I think the acronym is correct there), then they quite like think that one day they should be accepted also.

So universal acceptance isnt a reality...and my utopian civilization has just fallen entirely apart.

Well it's probably a good thing your utopian vision fell apart at the planning stage because the implementation and realisation phases usually involve tens of millions of corpses piling up and stinking the place out. Check out the 20thC.

No borders... aaand you really think you and yours will be better off under that system???????????????? I don't really know your situation but being part of the global 1% income and asset wise is almost certainly within your reach. Here and now.

https://www.investopedia.com/article...cent-world.asp

I'm sorry our society frowns on your meth use but the West has evolved with alcohol being our drug of choice... shitty drug of choice TBH... but meth doesn't strike me as being much superior. Legalising cannabis? Prolly get behind that... there's still costs and benefits to be weighed though.

[oldrider]

Bill Cooper:- What he said. http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=174920 - was he right?

[Katman]

http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment...demand-service

[Woodman]

http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment...demand-service

They put it on demand under the heading "documentary" where it should have been under the heading "For fuckwits".

[Ocean1]

They put it on demand under the heading "documentary" where it should have been under the heading "For fuckwits".

It's probably got as much credibility as any other contemporary "documentary" not involving Attenborough.

Journalists, they can't help themselves, they just have to sensationalise shit, and fuck the facts.

[Drew]

http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment...demand-service

It's your belief that this piece of shit being removed is somehow an infringement of free speech?

[Katman]

It's your belief that this piece of shit being removed is somehow an infringement of free speech?

Have you watched any of the documentary Drew?

[husaberg]

Have you watched any of the documentary Drew?

Why don't you Give us all a synopsis of the facts contained in the "documentary"

[Drew]

Have you watched any of the documentary Drew?

Short bits.

Have you avoided my question for any reason?

I'm not commenting on the program at all.

[eldog]

Short bits.

Have you avoided my question for any reason?

I'm not commenting on the program at all.

He hasn’t watched it, just wants somebody else to summarise it for him.
or he will slowly drip feed husa or TDL et al arguments
why bother?

[Drew]

He hasn’t watched it, just wants somebody else to summarise it for him.
or he will slowly drip feed husa or TDL et al arguments
why bother?

I just wanna know why he posted it up.

The broadcaster was wildly optimistic by labeling the documentary as factual and educational. So when called about that, they pulled it.

They aired the thing, couple times I think. Hardly seems like suppressing anything to me.

[Woodman]

It's not a documentary, it's propaganda.

[eldog]

I just wanna know why he posted it up.

The broadcaster was wildly optimistic by labeling the documentary as factual and educational. So when called about that, they pulled it.

They aired the thing, couple times I think. Hardly seems like suppressing anything to me.

If it’s from stuff

then it’s usually just some hyped up crap

stuff and Windows feeds are on ignore for me.

[Berries]

It's not a documentary, it's propaganda.

Bloody Welsh and their plans to conquer the world.

[Katman]

I'm not commenting on the program at all.

Except for labelling it a 'piece of shit'.

I'm intrigued to know your reasoning.