Free speech.

[Katman]

Everything I've just found says that the capability is there, but its not happening yet.

Got a credible source that confirms it is being practiced?

Cloud seeding has been around since the 40's.

[Drew]

Cloud seeding has been around since the 40's.

Cloud seeding has been possible, and tested rarely since the 40s.

But again, that's not in the stratosphere...you know...like the title suggests...STRATOSHPERIC Aerosol Injection.

[Drew]

Cloud seeding has been around since the 40's.

Fucken tool.

[Katman]

Cloud seeding has been possible, and tested rarely since the 40s.

But again, that's not in the stratosphere...you know...like the title suggests...STRATOSHPERIC Aerosol Injection.

And you can safely bet that if the Director of the CIA is openly talking about stratospheric aerosol injection, they have been doing it for quite some time already.

[Drew]

And you can safely bet that if the Director of the CIA is openly talking about stratospheric aerosol injection, they have been doing it for quite some time already.

Ah, they said they could do they are doing it.

Solid argument.

Almost as solid as your rep comment.

[nzspokes]

The officially documented findings of the structures in Waipoua Forest are apparently considered that sensitive that they won't be released for public scrutiny till 2063.

That constitutes hidden away in my opinion.

Now thats some funny shit.

[Laava]

Fucken tool.

On second thoughts, it appears they may have been spraying retardant around Casa Katman!

[Graystone]

Well it appears that the 75 year moratorium imposed on certain information relating to Waipoua Forest was challenged and removed in 1996.

http://www.celticnz.co.nz/embargo_saga.html

Amazing what happens when you fact check the shit you post right!

[Katman]

Amazing what happens when you fact check the shit you post right!

Well I suppose the next question that an enquiring mind would ask is, what was considered so sensitive as to warrant a 75 year restriction in the first place?

[Graystone]

Well I suppose the next question that an enquiring mind would ask is, what was considered so sensitive as to warrant a 75 year restriction in the first place?

Such a 'mind' could read it and let us know

[TheDemonLord]

So I see Chelsea Manning wants to come to NZ and talk and National are opposing this as she is a convicted Felon.

Me personally, I say let her come in and Speak.

There are some issues around her whistleblowing that are contentious and I don't think I agree with - but hiding behind the "Convicted Felon" (it was under the UCMJ she was convicted, I'm not sure if that changes whether she's a Felon but whatevs) - her sentence was Commuted and as far as I'm concerned - what she has to say (regardless of my feelings on it) is now in the Public interest and therefore she should come and Speak.

[husaberg]

So I see Chelsea Manning wants to come to NZ and talk and National are opposing this as she is a convicted Felon.

Me personally, I say let her come in and Speak.

There are some issues around her whistleblowing that are contentious and I don't think I agree with - but hiding behind the "Convicted Felon" (it was under the UCMJ she was convicted, I'm not sure if that changes whether she's a Felon but whatevs) - her sentence was Commuted and as far as I'm concerned - what she has to say (regardless of my feelings on it) is now in the Public interest and therefore she should come and Speak.

Shes lucky to be out of jail and she could have been sentenced to death in relation to the charges she was charged with
I have no interest in what she says either way.
What was the outcome of Mike Tysons latest attempt to visit NZ?

looks like he was booked in again in 2017 i thought he was barred from entry for life?

[Katman]

I have no interest in what she says either way.

Then don't go and listen to her if she does come here.

That's how free speech should work - you're free to ignore it if it doesn't interest you.

[Graystone]

Then don't go and listen to her if she does come here.

That's how free speech should work - you're free to ignore it if it doesn't interest you.

Not quite, free speech also allows you to tell others to shut the fuck up or go fuck their hats, preferably both.

[husaberg]

Then don't go and listen to her if she does come here.

That's how free speech should work - you're free to ignore it if it doesn't interest you.

I think you are confusing me with someone who considers your opinion relevant or even well thought out..
No criminal should be able to further profit out of their crime after being convicted and released.
So unless you also believe Mike Tyson should also be able to come to NZ and give speeches about how to rape women, maybe you should re think through your simplistic free speech definition.
Maybe you will then realise its not as simple as that.