So I see Chelsea Manning wants to come to NZ and talk and National are opposing this as she is a convicted Felon.
Me personally, I say let her come in and Speak.
There are some issues around her whistleblowing that are contentious and I don't think I agree with - but hiding behind the "Convicted Felon" (it was under the UCMJ she was convicted, I'm not sure if that changes whether she's a Felon but whatevs) - her sentence was Commuted and as far as I'm concerned - what she has to say (regardless of my feelings on it) is now in the Public interest and therefore she should come and Speak.
Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress
Shes lucky to be out of jail and she could have been sentenced to death in relation to the charges she was charged with
I have no interest in what she says either way.
What was the outcome of Mike Tysons latest attempt to visit NZ?
looks like he was booked in again in 2017 i thought he was barred from entry for life?
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
I think you are confusing me with someone who considers your opinion relevant or even well thought out..
No criminal should be able to further profit out of their crime after being convicted and released.
So unless you also believe Mike Tyson should also be able to come to NZ and give speeches about how to rape women, maybe you should re think through your simplistic free speech definition.
Maybe you will then realise its not as simple as that.
![]()
Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks