F you really? you clearly dont have the sort of cash or the assets required for that to ever occur.
Sorry so lets get this straight (see what i did there)you have time to respond multiple times, Yet not enough to give an answer?
That is some funny arse shit, Are you planning on running as an independent for Tauranga next year? Because with that level of bluster with zero substance you are a shoe in in a safe National seat.
Provided of course you can stump up with the $200,000.
Jasons own record for claiming he can easily back up his statement with a fact or a simple example "only hes too busy " is over a page long spread over a week.
Maybe thats just the average trump supporters memory length.
What did you call me on again?
I see you asked me if I voted Bridges, what else was there?
And it really does matter if they are counting houses in the kiwi build figures that were already there.
The technical term is lying or deception, but as long as it's your darling doing it then that's fine isint it?
Claiming that CGT was a breach of the no the new taxes.
I posted 400+ lies John key was caught out in,with no a peep from you......
now you are trying to get out of your tax claims it by calling deception on not enough houses that were built...........
So you voted for Bridges, a guy that only 5% of all voters rate as being up to being a PM, A guy that even only 12% of national voters rate him as being up to being PM
Yet you still somehow rate your opinion?
You were also Pretty Sure" Trump would make a decent president.
My understanding is that had the CGT been approved (fuck Winston Peters by the way) it would have been introduced after Labour/Coalition was re-elected. Specifically the campaign promise (again, as I recall it) was no new taxes this term - i.e. the term ending 2020, and so if they had introduced the CGT in the next term, there would have been no "lie".
Personally I think that done properly a CGT could have been OK. Just to take an example, residential landlords always go on about their "business" and if a business generates a profit then that is by definition a taxable profit. As long as the other principle of tax law is followed (i.e. allowing the costs that went into making that profit as deductions) then I'm comfortable.
But the realpolitik fact of the matter is that it is electoral poison so its been dropped. I've said before but not sure on here that in my view it is a last ditch kneejerk by the representative for entitled boomers personified by Winston Peters that has fucked it.
But, its off the table so we just get to move on now.
And honestly, Jacinda could crap on a church step and shoot a baby in the face and still be better than the current crop of Natzis.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
[QUOTE=husaberg;1131130247]
You were also Pretty Sure" Trump would make a decent president.[/
I’m pretty sure I didn’t say that.
Lets go Brandon
Yup.
Seems about right.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/a...ectid=12223818
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks