TV reported the aftermath of the Pender murder trial in ChCh. Pender killed a guy armed with nunchucks that had assaulted his girlfriend and was threatening to kill him, shooting him with a crossbow.
The dead guys mother said that her son was a gentle person who never used violence.
So why was he beating up women and threatening to kill someone?
Why wasn't he at home making a cuppa for his loving mum?
It seems that Pender was no angel either, but at least another clear message has gone out that if you're seriously threatened by some thug, there's sufficient commonsense shown by some juries that you may defend yourself effectively and not be convicted.
Bookmarks