Pender and his brief took a gamble and refused the option of a manslaughter verdict. It was murder or acquittal. The jury gave him the benefit of the doubt.
A big risk, but it paid off.
But I think his karma will catch up to him too.
Pender and his brief took a gamble and refused the option of a manslaughter verdict. It was murder or acquittal. The jury gave him the benefit of the doubt.
A big risk, but it paid off.
But I think his karma will catch up to him too.
And how many people are going to be dumb enough to put that in their statements? (Yes, I'm sure there are some you could tell us about, but that's not my point).Originally Posted by spudchucka
Thats the reason I clearly stated it as an opinion, and added the word 'probably'.Originally Posted by onearmedbandit
![]()
Okay maybe my terminolgy was incorrect, but as Lou said he waived the option of manslaughter, he did sign a statement that he intended to fire. So the jury were forced into either murder or self defence, not accidental death.
They are going to come down hard on MSSACB'sOriginally Posted by thehollowmen
(military style semi-automatic crossbows)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks