DME
Dimethyl ether, DME, is a synthetic, gaseous, diesel fuel that results in clean combustion with very little soot and reduced NOx emissions.
Recognized as a second generation Bio Fuel, it can be synthesized from any sort of crap (especially from Crap!)
Can be substituted for propane, in LPG. And, with slight modifications, diesel engines run well & cleanly on DME. It is also a refrigerant (the 1st, back in 1876) and is used in wart 'freeze spray)
At the 2009 European Shell Eco Marathon, an unofficial World Championship for mileage, a vehicle running on 100% dimethyl ether drove 589 km/liter (169.8 cm3 /100 km), fuel equivalent to gasoline with a 50 cm3 displacement 2-stroke engine.
Thanks to Wikipedia for the info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimeth...r#cite_note-23
And it has a cool looking molecule:
Also, the Diesel process runs un-throttled (Power follows Fuel, not air flow) & psuedo stratified, at the injection zone.
HCCI, by its very definition, requires a homogeneous charge.
DME might be the appropriate fuel for Neil's new OP engine, particularly if E85 is no longer an option.
Double up on the Green Credit points (a marketing bonus).
Cheers, Daryl.
I remember Neil (Flettner) saying that most of the noise came from the roots type blower - perhaps a turbo instead? which might fit in well with a lack of expansion chamber? - the 3 cylinder layout might be good (interconnected exhaust).
Looks like there will be a lot of jet fuel available in the future too - could that be vapourised (injected?) somewhere else? rather than at the top of the stroke by high pressure injection? (a homogenous mixture is required for petrol/HCCI of course)
So, what I'm asking - is it possible to have diesel operation with Jet Fuel using a fully homogenised (probably heated) charge but without the need for late high pressure direct injection to initiate combustion?
Last edited by WilDun; 3rd September 2020 at 14:19. Reason: extra question
Strokers Galore!
Cummins and Kharkov two stroke Opposite piston engines for tanks
http://www.malyshevplant.com/en/content/6td/
https://www.nationaldefensemagazine....ed-powertrains
https://revivaler.com/vincent-two-st...feboat-engine/
Same, 5 cylinder 5ТДФ type Opposite Piston engine in both videos. Direct evolution of Junkers Jumbo 205.
Torque at exhaust side crank approx 70 %, intake side 30 %. Engine can work on diesel, kerosene and gasoline Ron 72, just needed to move the knob to another position.
Compression 20.9 (effective 16.5 )
Two piece piston, top made made from heat resistant material and bolt on to the main alloy piston. Idex in scheme 22,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CGLanOPwnw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJwnV6MmNbQ
How about some simplicity
https://patents.google.com/patent/US...10%2c487%2c777
The two patents are current and effective 2035.
In both I see similarities with Katinas work:
The first patent the crankcase is also fed through the transfer windows (30a-32a).
The second patent has a reed valve controlling the transfer (24b)
https://patents.google.com/patent/US9726070B2/en
.
Makes a Hell of a mess if you blow one up, too!....
.
I am in doubt as to whether these statements in this patent are true or fake.
If true, why has it not been worked on evolving it?
https://patents.google.com/patent/US...=4%2c627%2c390
What are we looking at CECI?
A little more information please.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks