They did, and many used exceptionally trite reasoning. As with the suitcases, there was an explanation for a great many things and likely most of those cases were tossed on those merits. However those that are based on the data have not been clarified, not even remotely. The numbers didn't add up, something that was never denied, only ignored. Kind of important in many ways, but hey, not inconvenient enough to bring democracy to a halt (make no mistake, many a bottle went on that road for that reason)? As you say, and as I have already stated, the caughts, accused of corruption, said no... a corruption that we all know exists, but somehow "half" of us choose to conveniently ignore in this case coz TDS. Poetic in ways.
"If they want to investigate actual corruption, why not start with the corporate lobbyists essentially owning politicians arses" = shooting the messenger. No TDL action... just a straight up matter of fact. You do seem hell bent on not holding back on ye olde TDL action yerself: Oh I meant it very broadly, wah wah wah, stop putting words in my mouth wah wah wah... well, I didn't, they were your words, you simply translated what I had written poorly... but that is par for the course. Love your projection, keep it coming, you feel like you're making a breakthrough

Bookmarks