Ahh! Stooges huh? That's an old caper.
In fact I think they were in Black and White.![]()
Ahh! Stooges huh? That's an old caper.
In fact I think they were in Black and White.![]()
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
There are multiple reports that the Secretary of State for Georgia has commenced an inquiry into Trump's efforts to overturn the election result in that state. He's got good evidence, starting with that hour long "mob boss" phone call to the Governor.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
I asked the same thing, especially as Trump had loaded the bases in various offices to ensure that outcome. How could the opposite have happened, even after the Russia bullshit and impeachment had failed. Hmmmmmmm, yeah, it's a tricky one that... especially as there wasn't enough evidence for the majority of judges, not all, of voter fraud large enough to swing an election. How can some judges find that there is enough evidence, and yet most say no. I do wonder if you can answer the same question that no one else could.
I'll give you a hint, the answer starts with Corr and ends with uption. Whichever way you look at it, one lot of judges is bent. Lemme see now... yes, it's coming to me, lord, lord, yes lord make me a channel of your sandwich, "Someone cheated, coz they had judges in their pockets. Who won?".
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
[QUOTE=mashman;1131181460
I'll give you a hint, the answer starts with Corr and ends with uption. Whichever way you look at it, one lot of judges is bent. Lemme see now... yes, it's coming to me, lord, lord, yes lord make me a channel of your sandwich, "Someone cheated, coz they had judges in their pockets. Who won?".[/QUOTE]
The Republicans loaded the federal courts with hundreds of young right-thinking judges (245 actually) who were there to push the Republican agenda for a generation. Some were even rated "unqualified" to be a judge by the body that determines such things. Yet they were still appointed.
The Republicans stacked the Supreme Court in their favour by nefarious means too.
Yet Trump appointed judges found against Trump's "elite strike force" of lawyers at all levels and the Democrats won. There may well be corrupt judges but your theory makes absolutely no sense at all.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
Looking in the mirror again pritch?
Instead of providing proof of your claims you always shoot the messenger like you have been doing for over four years. Quite pathetic really.
Actually it is something you KB Knitting Circle Ladies do on quite a regular basis.
Nice wee last minute edit there pumkin![]()
Not disagreeing in the slightest. Yet with the dice loaded, he lost. Some of those he appointed turned against him. As you say:Originally Posted by pritch
Originally Posted by pritch
In your own words you have described a "fortress" of legal safety. How do you beat such things. Fortunately there was a miraculous crumbling of the fortress of loyalists, especially after having watched the BS of Russia and the Impeachment etc... and still very much supporting him, and with the improving economy pre-covid, they all of a sudden changed their minds, and rhetoric, to collude against him and give their sworn enemies the keys to the nation.Originally Posted by pritch
That loss of loyalty makes no sense, because there was no reason to be disloyal. Such disloyalty is usually achieved by applying some form of pressure... but hey, you don't like the notion of a Deep State, so we'll leave it at, his loyalists just changed their minds when it counted.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
Can you'll please remind me of what the outcome of the impeachment trials were thank you?
Aren't we still waiting for Shifts "Evidence in plain sight". How long has it been now?
Sweet dreams you KB Knitting Circle Ladies. Looking foward to todays posts on this topic.
Night night![]()
I admire your dedication - it's not a 5-minute read! I'm not sure how you conclude that the election was "rigged" though, but I usually have that problem with your posts.
I read a similar, although shorter, article late last year. Trump signalled long ago that he would claim mass electoral fraud if he lost in 2020, and this was a response to prevent that from happening.
Meanwhile, I have no doubt that the Republicans will redouble their voter suppression measures for the next elections, having for once been taken on at their own game. The US desperately needs an independent body to run their elections, along with reform of the electoral college and senate. But none of those are likely anytime soon.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks