Trump - 4 more years of this at least...

[sugilite:Me]

Get ready for the Trump social media platform
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/don...3W5O7HAARFVUA/

Names they are considering include...
Dick Dock, where far right conspiracy theorists can dock dicks and talk about the conspiracy of the day.
Turd Talk, a revolutionary platform that lets nut jobs plot and plan their next insurrection.
Twatter - A place for twats that still believe the election was stolen.
Face Fleece, In order to post - one must pay Trump first to keep the steal going strong.

It's gunna be epic

[pritch]

Sidney Powell, a member fo Trump's legal "dream team" is defending herself in court by stating that no resonable people would believe her election fraud claims.

May I respectfully suggest that any KBer who believed her nonsense, and we do have them, shoud spend the next several months in the naughty corner wearing a dunce hat.

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/22/p...aud/index.html

[TheDemonLord]

Sidney Powell, a member fo Trump's legal "dream team" is defending herself in court by stating that no resonable people would believe her election fraud claims.

May I respectfully suggest that any KBer who believed her nonsense, and we do have them, shoud spend the next several months in the naughty corner wearing a dunce hat.

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/22/p...aud/index.html

I love the difference between the headline and what was actually said:

Defendants' position that reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process."

And Powell wasn't part of Trump's official Legal team - as per your article:

Though the Trump campaign had sought to distance itself from Powell

[pritch]

And Powell wasn't part of Trump's official Legal team - as per your article:

She was part of the dream team until her insanity frightened the others off. Trump though wanted to see more of her, he liked her message, he wanted to give her a job investigating the election.

[sugilite:Me]

And Powell wasn't part of Trump's official Legal team - as per your article:

Pritch is right, she absolutely was part of the strike farce legal team.
She was shown the door for being to loony. Wonder what Rudi has to do to be shown the same door

[pritch]

Wonder what Rudi has to do to be shown the same door

Speaking of Rudy, he seems tp be lying low somewhere. Probably a good idea, but the long arm of the law should be reaching for him soonish.

[husaberg]

She was part of the dream team until her insanity frightened the others off. Trump though wanted to see more of her, he liked her message, he wanted to give her a job investigating the election.

Pritch is right, she absolutely was part of the strike farce legal team.
She was shown the door for being to loony. Wonder what Rudi has to do to be shown the same door

lets see
https://www.forbes.com/sites/carliep...h=58101a901dad

https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewals...h=29b1b34b1f9d
yip TLDR is wrong

[pritch]

lets see
https://www.forbes.com/sites/carliep...h=58101a901dad

https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewals...h=29b1b34b1f9d
yip TLDR is wrong

Interesting to see the phrase "actual malice" in that first item. In the US if a public figure, or in this case a company with a public profile, wants to sue for libel the bar is slightly higher than for a private individual. It is assumed that public figures will have things said about them that are not true so they have to prove "actual malice". Whether the judge will be convinced that Sidney acted with actual mallice is key.

This is just one of the legal problems she faces. She could face charges relating to whichever of the 60 post election court cases she was involved with. It's expected that at the very least she will be disbarred. Lawyers are not permitted to knowingly present false charges in court. Other members of Trump's 'strike force' will have similar problems. They did it sixty times. It's not like they could say, 'Ooops I slipped'.

[TheDemonLord]

She was part of the dream team until her insanity frightened the others off. Trump though wanted to see more of her, he liked her message, he wanted to give her a job investigating the election.

The latter part is true, but as you say, she left/wasn't part of the Dream Team.

[sugilite:Me]

The latter part is true, but as you say, she left/wasn't part of the Dream Team.

Thanks for confirming your error and confirming she was part of the team. Her getting fired does not erase her initial existence within team strike farce.
And - "Dream Teams" tend to not lose 59 out of 60 bro.

[TheDemonLord]

Thanks for confirming your error and confirming she was part of the team. Her getting fired does not erase her initial existence within team strike farce.
And - "Dream Teams" tend to not lose 59 out of 60 bro.

If you are fired before the Team plays it's first game, is it correct to say you played for the team?

Interestingly enough on this Subject - I was listening to a Discussion with Nigel Farage on this subject:

https://youtu.be/cS3-ls7_sjc?t=2076

Here's the link if you're interested, to the part where the discussion takes place - it covers the Capitol Riots, Trump's speech, The Election - and I find myself very much in Nigel's position - in particular on this point:

"It's one thing to know there's Postal fraud happening, but it's another to be able to prove it in Court"

[pritch]

If you are fired before the Team plays it's first game, is it correct to say you played for the team?

Interestingly enough on this Subject - I was listening to a Discussion with Nigel Farage on this subject:

https://youtu.be/cS3-ls7_sjc?t=2076

Here's the link if you're interested, to the part where the discussion takes place - it covers the Capitol Riots, Trump's speech, The Election - and I find myself very much in Nigel's position - in particular on this point:

"It's one thing to know there's Postal fraud happening, but it's another to be able to prove it in Court"

She wasn't fired before the first game. She was a major player.

Quoting Nigel Farage? I don't know what to say. If you want to discuss a shonky elections there's a great example. The Brexit campaign was based on lies, breaches of electoral law, and financed to an extent by Russian money. Putin must be very pleased with Nigel and his fellow useful idiots.

In the US election there was zero proof of fraud except for some minor instances by Republican voters. There were recounts and audits but none found anything significant. These checks were in many cases conducted by Republicans. The net result was that there was nothing found that would have changed the result. The guy in charge of the electronic component of the election rated it the most secure ever. So of course Trump fired him. Nobody with a grasp of reality believes there was significant fraud. It just isn't credible.

[TheDemonLord]

She wasn't fired before the first game. She was a major player.

That's highly questionable.

Quoting Nigel Farage? I don't know what to say. If you want to discuss a shonky elections there's a great example. The Brexit campaign was based on lies, breaches of electoral laws, and financed to an extent by Russian money. Putin must be very pleased with Nigel and his fellow useful idiots.

I happen to like Nigel. Not all the time, but well - "You all laughed at me then, well you're not laughing now"

But I can assure you - Anti-EU sentiments have absolutely NOTHING to do with Russian Money. I can post you videos from Yes Minister/Yes Prime Minister in the 80s that show the British attitude to the EU. Well before Russian Money was a thing and whilst the Iron Curtain was still up.

If you aren't a member of the London bubble - the encroachment of EU regulation and the fact that your elected representative cannot propose legislation in the EU Parliament is a reason for not wanting to be a part of it.

If you are a blue-collar worker whose community and livelihood has been drastically changed (and not in a positive manner) by the Free movement of People, then that's your reason for not wanting to be a part of it.

In both cases Lies (and I'll be more than happy to list of the multitude of Remoaner lies that were lambasted as false at the time and subsequently have been proven to be lies), Breaches of Electoral Law and whatever other 'reasons' you might raise as to why those poor stupid Gammon voted to leave need not apply.

In the US election there was zero proof of fraud except for some minor instances by Republican voters. There were recounts and audits but none found anything significant. These checks were in many cases conducted by Republicans. The net result was that there was nothing found that would have changed the result. The guy in charge of the electronic component of the election rated it the most secure ever. So of course Trump fired him. Nobody with a grasp of reality believes there was significant fraud. It just isn't credible.

Except for the woman arrested in Texas for systematic Mail-in Vote fraud (for the Democrats). Let's gloss over that. Let's also gloss over the changes made to the Electoral process by a number of states that didn't go through the proper process as per their own constitutions.

And the point Nigel makes is very succinct, it's one thing to know something is happening, but another to be able to prove it beyond all reasonable doubt. I can think of many high-profile cases in this country where we definitively knew someone was guilty, but we were unable to prove to the required standard.

[Viking01]

But I can assure you - Anti-EU sentiments have absolutely NOTHING to do with Russian Money.

....

In both cases Lies (and I'll be more than happy to list of the multitude of Remoaner lies that were lambasted as false at the time and subsequently have been proven to be lies), Breaches of Electoral Law and whatever other 'reasons' you might raise as to why those poor stupid Gammon voted to leave need not apply.

.....

Russian money. Look, will you please keep to the party Line ?

List of Remoaner Lies: Yes, please. I for one would be interested. Thanks.

[pritch]

Hmmm just checked the name of the journalist who had been pushing the Russian money claim against Aaron Banks who headed the Vote Leave body. It seems that Banks sued the journalist and won because she could not substantiate her claims. In which case I will withdraw the comment about Russian money since that seems tenuous now.