Trump - 4 more years of this at least...

[pete376403]

Obviously, no from me

[sugilite:Me]

Well... Just hold on there Bud.

It's not my Favourite Songsheet... It's Letitia James' Song sheet

There is very little with that video that i disagree with. In this woman, i feel slippery trump has met his match. She is an unrelenting force that i believe will ultimately finally take trump down.

From the same CNN article:

That admission, from CNN (of all places), is more of a win than a conviction.

I mean sure, Convictions would be nice.

You have a very strange idea of what a win constitutes. Shock horror, a political party paying money to dig up dirt on the other team? Give me a break

[TheDemonLord]

There is very little with that video that i disagree with. In this woman, i feel slippery trump has met his match. She is an unrelenting force that i believe will ultimately finally take trump down.

We'll see, you see an Unrelenting force - I see Activist and Malicious prosecution.

And no comment about the Election Denial? Thanks for confirming - it's only wrong when the right does it

You have a very strange idea of what a win constitutes. Shock horror, a political party paying money to dig up dirt on the other team? Give me a break

Sure, Dirt Digging, although I find it personally distasteful, is a fact.

However it's this line, specifically:

the largely discredited dossier was a collection of unverified and salacious allegations

And I happen to think that when you've run a Hoax, for 4 years, against a sitting President, that no doubt influenced the election that is based on what you now have to admit was "the largely discredited dossier was a collection of unverified and salacious allegations" (they couldn't quite bring themselves to say Hoax...) - that acknowledgement is pretty vindicating.

As I said - Convictions would be nice, but are unlikely.

[1/32 man]

Obviously.

And a resounding 'absolutely' from me.

Well so far that is two no's and one voided vote as there is no "absolutely" box to tick.

No=2
Yes=0
Invalid=1

Anyone else care to post their voting preference for Trump?

[TheDemonLord]

Well so far that is two no's and one voided vote as there is no "absolutely" box to tick.

No=2
Yes=0
Invalid=1

Anyone else care to post their voting preference for Trump?

"Everyone knows the World is Flat"
"Everyone knows that Slavery is the way of things"

Yeah, Argumentum Ad Populum isn't gonna fly.

[sugilite:Me]

Well... Just hold on there Bud.

It's not my Favourite Songsheet... It's Letitia James' Song sheet:

It depends on what her definition of an illegitimate president is when it pertains to trump? Did she say he was elected fraudulently? Or was the illegitimacy because he was completely devoid of any meaningful experience to become president? I sure agree with the latter.

Overall I feel she wants to take down powerful individuals that abuse their positions of power, such as when she torpedoed the very left leaning Cuomo.
https://deadline.com/2021/10/letitia...or-1234865051/

I mean, we've got Election denial (only a problem if you are a republican I guess...) "This Illegitimate President"

Hell yeah, I well remember the dems launching more than 50 failed court cases after the 2016 election, then now at the mid terms all the dems running seeking Bidens endorsement all had to first embrace the big lie that the 2020 election was stolen - oh wait, that's right, it was ALL the Trump led republicans

From the same CNN article: The largely discredited dossier was a collection of unverified and salacious allegations compiled by retired British spy Christopher Steele, whose dirt-digging was indirectly funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign in 2016.

That admission, from CNN (of all places), is more of a win than a conviction.

I mean sure, Convictions would be nice - but given the company that was kept and the strings attached, such a conviction was unlikely.

I'm not sure what the issue is here, a dossier put together by foreign spy needed investigation, it subsequently was found to be primarily bullshit and even the left leaning media are reporting it as such. What more do you want? Trumps big lie on the other hand......

And since you seem to like convictions, you should jump from team loser Duram to team winner Mueller where upon you can bask in the winning ratio of multiple convictions - just look at them all!
https://time.com/5556331/mueller-inv...-guilty-pleas/

Sure, Dirt Digging, although I find it personally distasteful, is a fact.

However it's this line, specifically:

So, Trumps "perfect" phone call where he threatened to withhold aid unless Zelensky handed Trump some dirt on Hunter Biden did not cross your line?
Or do you just break out the tissues, xanax and smelling salts when the dems dig dirt?

[sugilite:Me]

So lets take a voting poll here....before I go off triggered and upset.

Would you vote for Trump?

It's a nope from me.

It is a no from me.

(which does not = a yes for Biden)

[1/32 man]

"Everyone knows the World is Flat"
"Everyone knows that Slavery is the way of things"

Yeah, Argumentum Ad Populum isn't gonna fly.

and don't forget, "illegitmi non carborundum" keep on trying TDL. I like your style although not your view point.


So if I give TDL a yes vote (no triggering please)

we have ....

Yes=1
No=3

anyone else care to add a simple yes or no?

[pritch]

Well so far that is two no's and one voided vote as there is no "absolutely" box to tick.

No=2
Yes=0
Invalid=1

Anyone else care to post their voting preference for Trump?

That'd be a no from me, much to the surprise of nobody at all.

Saw this yesterday and thought it was sexcellent. If the Democrat party were only half as good at making ads as some of the independent groups...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mw9OQ8s5dZ8

[TheDemonLord]

It depends on what her definition of an illegitimate president is when it pertains to trump? Did she say he was elected fraudulently? Or was the illegitimacy because he was completely devoid of any meaningful experience to become president? I sure agree with the latter.

Hell yeah, I well remember the dems launching more than 50 failed court cases after the 2016 election, then now at the mid terms all the dems running seeking Bidens endorsement all had to first embrace the big lie that the 2020 election was stolen - oh wait, that's right, it was ALL the Trump led republicans

Maybe not the court cases, but I certainly remember a good number of Democrats denying the Election result. Most famously there was the montage played at the (failed) impeachment trial for Trump.

Overall I feel she wants to take down powerful individuals that abuse their positions of power, such as when she torpedoed the very left leaning Cuomo.
https://deadline.com/2021/10/letitia...or-1234865051/

That is one possibility, another is removing a rival from her political ambitions.

I'm not sure what the issue is here, a dossier put together by foreign spy needed investigation, it subsequently was found to be primarily bullshit and even the left leaning media are reporting it as such. What more do you want?

What more do I want? Well, a full blown retraction would be nice, an acknowledgement that the lie that had been perpetuated for 4 years influ... I mean 'Fortified' the Election, and an apology for all the times us Trump supporters were smeared with the 'Russia Russia Russia' Hoax.

And since you seem to like convictions, you should jump from team loser Duram to team winner Mueller where upon you can bask in the winning ratio of multiple convictions - just look at them all!
https://time.com/5556331/mueller-inv...-guilty-pleas/

Er? I said convictions weren't what I'm after. All that does is show how much more 'effective' the FBI is at going after Republicans than Democrats - which is what I would expect from an organization that has gone Partisan.

So, Trumps "perfect" phone call where he threatened to withhold aid unless Zelensky handed Trump some dirt on Hunter Biden did not cross your line?
Or do you just break out the tissues, xanax and smelling salts when the dems dig dirt?

Now, if our positions on this point had been reversed, you'd be accusing me of putting words in your mouth.

To be clear - I find dirt digging distasteful. But it is a reality. I didn't cry that Hilary's team sort to dig up dirt - that's fine, what I 'cried' over was a 4 year long hoax that was based on a fabrication. Not Dirt, Fabrication.

You are oft fond of pointing to Trump's dubious relationship with the Truth (even if most of what is pointed to is just mere linguistic flourishes) - how does that sit with you?

In terms of the Ukraine/Hunter scenario, I personally believe that there is more factual basis for some form of investigation. I think the furthest I've gone is to point to the treatment of Trump by the Dems and say that based on their standards of behavior, Biden should be impeached (Goose/Gander)

[TheDemonLord]

and don't forget, "illegitmi non carborundum" keep on trying TDL. I like your style although not your view point.

Oh I've been here for a while and had many Dance Partners.

And as I say - Time has been wonderfully kind of late.

[1/32 man]

Great, thanks Pritch

No=4
Yes=1

Once again, TDL I admire your persistence and your stand alone position. That may change though.

Come one, come all and cast a vote .....Yay or nay for Trump.

See how democratic we are here? you actually can say just about anything and you are still allowed a vote.....and it is transparent.

[mashman]

No. plus chars.

[Laava]

Def a no from me!

[1/32 man]

Thanks mashman and Laava

No=6
Yes=1