Trump - 4 more years of this at least...

[Stylo]

Methinks you quoted the wrong post.

Ah Putin. Invaded the Donbas under Obama.
Invaded the rest of Ukraine under Biden.

Yet, somehow did nothing whilst Trump was in office and somehow Trump was his puppet...

For one who is accusing others of Cult like thinking, I cannot imagine the mental gymnastics required to make that make sense.

Putin invaded the Donbas under Obama.

Or, was he above Obama ? You mke no sense. Obama was over a decade ago.

Your cult leader Donald speaks about as much sense as you. Bow down to stupidity my friend. Hitler loves you. Your Donald could'nt care if you were alive or dead.

As long as you keep promoting him, you'll be fine.

[TheDemonLord]

Konstantin with a hilarious take.

[TheDemonLord]

You are making a very basic mistake if you think that trump understands most of what he says.

He continually calls Kamala a Socialist / Communist / Fascist.... he has no idea, they are just trigger words, to get reactions from the MAGAts.

Fascist is definitely a trigger word for TDL.

Yes, all the Fascists were Marxists first, China is an objectively Fascist state, under the Guise of being Communist.

But don't worry, next time Trump says something you are aghast at, I'll simply quote this and Pritch ad nauseum

[TheDemonLord]

Putin invaded the Donbas under Obama.

Or, was he above Obama ? You mke no sense. Obama was over a decade ago.

Your cult leader Donald speaks about as much sense as you. Bow down to stupidity my friend. Hitler loves you. Your Donald could'nt care if you were alive or dead.

As long as you keep promoting him, you'll be fine.

I'm sorry I presumed a degree of historical literacy.

[Laava]

https://youtu.be/YY_8WzcHqMQ

[sugilite:Me]

A 965 word wall

Here is my 133 word response.
Canon threw out the case on the grounds of special councils are not a legally appointed thing. This has been tried 3 times already. All failed
Robert Mueller - 2017-2019
Ken Starr - 1994-1999
Lawrence Walsh - 1986-1992
In her brief, Canon quoted the massively compromised and corrupt thomas who essentially gave a "shout out" to her in comments in an unrelated case.
https://www.newsweek.com/clarence-th...schner-1927980
canon dismissed this case on the very date of the commencement of the big RNC convention. that stinks to high heaven.

The 11th circuit appeals court will reinstate the charges in a rebuke to canon (again) for her lack of ability when it comes to applying law - this time with no case presidents in sight.

canon has proven herself a trump stooge and is corrupt as fuck.

[sugilite:Me]

The legitimate polls are all over the place.

Every single poll that involves trump has been horrendously wrong in every election since 2016, including all the mid term ones. The problem is they have been wrong in both directions. I'm just going to wait and see.

[TheDemonLord]

Here is my 133 word response.
Canon threw out the case on the grounds of special councils are not a legally appointed thing. This has been tried 3 times already. All failed
Robert Mueller - 2017-2019
Ken Starr - 1994-1999
Lawrence Walsh - 1986-1992
In her brief, Canon quoted the massively compromised and corrupt thomas who essentially gave a "shout out" to her in comments in an unrelated case.
https://www.newsweek.com/clarence-th...schner-1927980
canon dismissed this case on the very date of the commencement of the big RNC convention. that stinks to high heaven.

The 11th circuit appeals court will reinstate the charges in a rebuke to canon (again) for her lack of ability when it comes to applying law - this time with no case presidents in sight.

canon has proven herself a trump stooge and is corrupt as fuck.

Two of those (Ken Starr and Lawrence Walsh) were covered by the sunsetted law that no longer exists, since they were covered by a Law, they are not relevant to the discussion.

I would have to look into Mueller.

I know you think Clarence Thomas is corrupt - but the man has been pretty consistent on his constitutional views over 30 years. Whilst I agree the higher court will likely rule against it, the ultimate conclusion is that this goes to the Supreme Court to rule on the matter of Special Counsels - as was Canons point in her argument.

Bearing in mind - when I read the legal discussion around her decision (from both Left and Right wing judges) none of them said she was Corrupt. The most pointed criticism was that dismissing a key part of the Nixon case. An argument, that you will note, I had a lot of sympathy for.

[pritch]

Every single poll that involves trump has been horrendously wrong in every election since 2016, including all the mid term ones. The problem is they have been wrong in both directions. I'm just going to wait and see.

I'm just beginning to permit myself to be a tad optimistic. The Republicans have no "ground game" this time because all the money raised went to Trump's campaign. In the swing sates and elsewhere they have, minimal advertising, very few door knockers, people arranging transport to the polls, or any of the other jobs that party staff would usually organise.

Behemoth "Dump the Trump" beers will be on hand for the night of the election. Champagne will be available if Harris eventually wins.

[Grumph]

Many reports are saying that the anti Puerto Rican comments at the MSG rally may be enough to turn Pennsylvania against Trump.

Very large PR community in that state. And as a swing state saying what was said may have been a very bad mistake.

[sugilite:Me]

I'm just beginning to permit myself to be a tad optimistic. The Republicans have no "ground game" this time because all the money raised went to Trump's campaign. In the swing sates and elsewhere they have, minimal advertising, very few door knockers, people arranging transport to the polls, or any of the other jobs that party staff would usually organise.

I saw a report that repub voters are early voting in record numbers never seen before. I'm sure shit stain trump won't have any issues with those mail in ballots.

I know you think Clarence Thomas is corrupt - but the man has been pretty consistent on his constitutional views over 30 years. Whilst I agree the higher court will likely rule against it, the ultimate conclusion is that this goes to the Supreme Court to rule on the matter of Special Counsels - as was Canons point in her argument.

The man has received many times his yearly salary in travel gifts, mothers houses purchased, very expensive college educations paid for, and that's just what we know. The only reason he has not been booted is because they basically have no standards to adhere to. Which is mind boggling in itself. So with this blatant corruption on full display, how much do you think I give a fuck how the assholes voting has been consistent? Would you say the same thing if an abjectly corrupt dem judge was found taking the massive bribes that thomas has? "Oh that judge has been a consistent voter - so all good" I think not.

[F5 Dave]

I'm just beginning to permit myself to be a tad optimistic. The Republicans have no "ground game" this time because all the money raised went to Trump's campaign. In the swing sates and elsewhere they have, minimal advertising, very few door knockers, people arranging transport to the polls, or any of the other jobs that party staff would usually organise.

Behemoth "Dump the Trump" beers will be on hand for the night of the election. Champagne will be available if Harris eventually wins.

I've ordered some on a whim.

[TheDemonLord]

The man has received many times his yearly salary in travel gifts, mothers houses purchased, very expensive college educations paid for, and that's just what we know. The only reason he has not been booted is because they basically have no standards to adhere to. Which is mind boggling in itself. So with this blatant corruption on full display, how much do you think I give a fuck how the assholes voting has been consistent? Would you say the same thing if an abjectly corrupt dem judge was found taking the massive bribes that thomas has? "Oh that judge has been a consistent voter - so all good" I think not.

Imagine for a second, that suddenly I got paid by Trump or the Trump campaign: Knowing my previous opinions on the Man, if I continued to espouse the exact same opinions - would you say I am corrupt?

You abjectly corrupt Dem Judge - therein lies the problem - Clarence Thomas has been really consistent on matters of the Constitution for over 30 years. If there is Abject Corruption - show me a case where Thomas ruled against the constitution.

[pritch]

I've ordered some on a whim.

Their last American election effort was a nice drop. Expensive though as it introduced me to craft beers. Mostly I get craft cans from Beer Hug for about $6.50 a can incl courier, although these were a bit more expensive.

The ongoing fallout from The Madison Square Garden rally is mildly amusing. It may have been that Trump was tone deaf but I think it more likely the choice of venue was deliberate. There were huge pro NAZI rallies at Madison Square Garden in the 1930s and it should have been obvious that comparisons would be made. The general tenor of the speeches fit the occasion though. The Trump Campaign are now concerned at the fall out from the garbage island joke. They have claimed they didn't know the comment was coming. Highly unlikely. The comedian's script had been checked. It had included a "joke" about Kamala Harris referring to her by the c word. He was told not to use that.

[pritch]

The Trump Campaign has filed a legal action against Bucks County in Pennsylvania alleging election fraud. The election is still a week away and they don't start counting votes in Pennsylvania until then.

Where do they find these idiot lawyers? Surely these people know what happened to Ellis, Powell, Clark, Eastman, Chesebro, the now broke Giuliani, and the others.