Originally Posted by
Kickaha
Does anyone actually take Gulliani seriously and believe he has the evidence to back any of his rantings up ?
Nobody with a clue, and no.
If he had any evidence he would have produced it already at any one of the thirty odd cases they've lost. When the judges ask if he is alleging fraud, he is quick to say that he is not. He can say anything he likes next to porno places and landscaping businesses, but in court he has to stick to facts - and he hasn't got any. The opinion of one professor of constitutional and electoral law is that Rudy's performance is not about the law, it's theatre for Trump's base.
Rudy's colleague Sidney is now accusing named politicians of taking bribes. If her evidence for that isn't a whole lot better than the insanity she's been spouting so far, she could be in trouble.
Meanwhile Trump is moving to his Plan B: delay the election certification process in chosen states.
His plan C will likely be an attempt to corrupt the electoral college process.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
Bookmarks