Page 93 of 380 FirstFirst ... 43839192939495103143193 ... LastLast
Results 1,381 to 1,395 of 5695

Thread: Trump

  1. #1381
    Join Date
    29th July 2020 - 20:26
    Bike
    Suzuki GSX-s1000F 2016
    Location
    Napier
    Posts
    103
    Doesn’t tRump have team of people to explain what he meant by what he said?

    It is a bigly team too and they probably eat a lot of hamberders

  2. #1382
    Join Date
    20th January 2010 - 14:41
    Bike
    husaberg
    Location
    The Wild Wild West
    Posts
    11,823
    Deutsche bank valued trump at 788 million in 2005 he owes them 340 million at the time he claimed to be worth 10 billion so it's more than a slight exaggeration.

    Trump nearly went personally bankrupt in the early 1990s, he left a handful of major U.S. banks on the hook for about $3.4 billion in loans he couldn't repay (and about $900 million of which he had personally guaranteed). Hotels, casinos, real estate, an airline and other parts of his debt-ridden portfolio went into bankruptcy protection. In the wake of that collapse, Trump became a pariah among major U.S. banks, and he had to find unique ways of lining up money for the infrequent and small-bore
    deals he pursued thereafter. That left him borrowing money from labor unions and small, local lenders. Deutsche, keen at the time to make a name for itself in U.S. investment banking and commercial lending, was less hesitant to do business with Trump.

    Deutsche had a relatively intimate understanding of Trump's finances. Although Trump told me in 2004 and 2005 that his net worth was anywhere from $1.7 billion to $6 billion (and suggested it might even be $9.5 billion), my sources at the time told me his wealth was closer to $150 million to $250 million. When Trump litigated the point with me, my lawyers produced a Deutsche assessment of his finances that pegged his wealth at $788 million in 2005.

    In recent years, Deutsche's private banking unit has loaned Trump money — about $300 million, according to Bloomberg News and Trump's government financial disclosure forms — for such projects as his Washington hotel and the Trump National Doral golf course.
    Top Deutsche Bank AG executives were so concerned after the 2016 U.S. election that the Trump Organization might default on about $340 million of loans while Donald Trump was in office that they discussed extending repayment dates until after the end of a potential second term in 2025, according to people with knowledge of the discussions.
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...n-default-risk
    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/ar...ump-s-troubles
    https://internationalbusinessguide.o...siness-career/
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    I reminder distinctly .




    Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken

  3. #1383
    Join Date
    6th May 2008 - 14:15
    Bike
    She resents being called a bike
    Location
    Wellllie
    Posts
    1,494
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by 1/32 man View Post
    Doesn’t tRump have team of people to explain what he meant by what he said?

    It is a bigly team too and they probably eat a lot of hamberders
    So that's a no then. TDS strikes again
    I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!

  4. #1384
    Join Date
    8th January 2005 - 15:05
    Bike
    Triumph Speed Triple
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    10,080
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by mashman View Post
    So that's a no then. TDS strikes again
    Wrong again. It goes like this...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	he-didnt-say-that-and-if-he-did-he-didnt-30404596.png 
Views:	61 
Size:	136.2 KB 
ID:	347827  
    There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop

  5. #1385
    Join Date
    25th June 2012 - 11:56
    Bike
    Daelim VL250 Daystar
    Location
    Pyongyang
    Posts
    2,489
    Govt gives you nothing because it creates nothing - Javier Milei

  6. #1386
    Join Date
    6th May 2008 - 14:15
    Bike
    She resents being called a bike
    Location
    Wellllie
    Posts
    1,494
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by pritch View Post
    Wrong again. It goes like this...
    WTF are you talking about wrong? I asked for a quote whilst stating that I've never heard him state what 1/32 was stating that Trump had said. Also stated that I was not saying that Trump didn't say it. As such, you fit the TDS mould perfectly. Go on, say that you're not a Trump supporter and that therefore it's impossible to suffer TDS. Fuck that would make my day.
    I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!

  7. #1387
    Join Date
    8th January 2005 - 15:05
    Bike
    Triumph Speed Triple
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    10,080
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by mashman View Post
    WTF are you talking about wrong? I asked for a quote whilst stating that I've never heard him state what 1/32 was stating that Trump had said. Also stated that I was not saying that Trump didn't say it. As such, you fit the TDS mould perfectly. Go on, say that you're not a Trump supporter and that therefore it's impossible to suffer TDS. Fuck that would make my day.
    Perhaps you should take your meds and have a lie down.

    1/32 didn't say that Trump had said anything. He said Trump had a team to explain what what he meant. That's true, and they usually trot out nonsense very similar to that attachment I posted. Except it wouldn't normally be a group of women, it tends to be a succession of Trump's sycophantic politicians: Gaetz, Jordan and all.

    Nah it's a lost cause. Back on ignore you go, you're not making any sense.
    There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop

  8. #1388
    Join Date
    6th May 2008 - 14:15
    Bike
    She resents being called a bike
    Location
    Wellllie
    Posts
    1,494
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by pritch View Post
    Perhaps you should take your meds and have a lie down.

    1/32 didn't say that Trump had said anything. He said Trump had a team to explain what what he meant. That's true, and they usually trot out nonsense very similar to that attachment I posted. Except it wouldn't normally be a group of women, it tends to be a succession of Trump's sycophantic politicians: Gaetz, Jordan and all.

    Nah it's a lost cause. Back on ignore you go, you're not making any sense.
    .

    Quote Originally Posted by 1/32 man
    Testing does not increase the number of people with a disease
    tRump thinks so
    You clearly missed the post that created context. In other words, you misinterpreted what was going on by selecting the wrong post that my reply was to and went all spazlike. Fucking spectacular effort though Son, coz you constantly accuse Trump of doing those very things.
    I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!

  9. #1389
    Join Date
    20th January 2010 - 14:41
    Bike
    husaberg
    Location
    The Wild Wild West
    Posts
    11,823
    Quote Originally Posted by pritch View Post

    Nah it's a lost cause. Back on ignore you go, you're not making any sense.
    Good idea he soon will be on more ignore lists than he had votes in the last election.
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    I reminder distinctly .




    Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken

  10. #1390
    Join Date
    8th January 2005 - 15:05
    Bike
    Triumph Speed Triple
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    10,080
    Blog Entries
    1
    Trump paid three million dollars for recounts in the two most populace Wisconsin counties. (He couldn't afford the eight million for a full recount.). The second county has now reported in, it too increased Biden's vote count. This time by 87.

    So the idiot in chief spent three million dollars increasing Bidens majority by over 200 votes. Three dimensional chess indeed.
    There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop

  11. #1391
    Join Date
    7th January 2014 - 14:45
    Bike
    Not a Hayabusa anymore
    Location
    Not Gulf Harbour Either
    Posts
    1,460
    Quote Originally Posted by testastretta View Post
    Why dont you just say where the extra 700000 votes are?
    Remember I said 'if true', the figures were pulled from a public source - if they are wrong, then we'll find that out in the course of the legal process.

    But let's take the numbers from the 'fact check' - and there's 2 things that jump out:

    Firstly - almost a 90% return rate for the Democrat registered mail-in voters - which is quite high. 10% higher than the Republican and Independent registered voters. The unregistered voter return rate is also 5% higher than the Republican and Independent return rate (which are within 0.2% of each other) - the fact that the Independants and Republican return rates are so close to each other, suggests that this should be taken as a Baseline.

    Secondly - look at the Mail-in Tally for Biden - 1.99 Million Mail in votes (as per the screenshot, that doesn't represent the final vote tally), then look at the supposedly 'accurate' final mail-in ballot numbers - in order to hit 1.99 Million (remember, not his final tally):

    - Every single registered Democrat would need to vote for Biden (fair enough, most likely to have happened).
    - Every single unregistered voter would also need to vote for Biden (That's a bit odd - that of unregistered voters, 100% of them would vote for Biden - That is what we call a discrepency)

    And that only gets Biden to 1.98 Million votes (assuming 100% of the returned ballots for those 2 groups are for him)

    - A Number of registered republicans would ALSO need to vote for Biden (which is not impossible, but given the above assumption we are making for the Democrats, it's a bit suspicious)

    And then we do the inverse:

    Donald Trumps figures (as per the screenshot):

    - Not every registered republican voting for him (as above not impossible)
    - No unregistered voters voting for him (odd)
    - No registered Democrat voting for him (which is reasonable, but still a bit odd)

    As I've said multiple times, none of these are conclusively prove 'fraud' - but if your tally requires 100% (or close to 100%) of a demographic to do something, that's suspicious.
    Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress

  12. #1392
    Join Date
    8th November 2005 - 12:25
    Bike
    Aprillia RSV1000R 92 KX500
    Location
    Ardmore, New Zealand
    Posts
    2,235
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by TheDemonLord View Post
    usual wall of text
    With nearly 40 - 40!!!! failed court cases and still no fraud proved is a veritable mountain of evidence to support there was in fact near 0% voter fraud, you are clinging on to a comparatively sized small grain of sand of a now deleted and debunked post. This is taking the defend your position at all costs to impressive new levels

    Latest Trump fail.... note this paragraph - very similar to the comments made regarding a lot of these cases "Justices also remarked on the lawsuit’s staggering demand that an entire election be overturned retroactively. “They have failed to allege that even a single mail-in ballot was fraudulently cast or counted,” justice David Wecht wrote in a concurring opinion."
    https://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampp...-mail-in-votes

    Fellow Demonlord Trump loving desperadoes over in fox news comment sections are clinging onto the notion that this is Trumps cunning plan to lose all these cases in order to get to the Supreme court where his legal team will triumphantly lay out the compelling evidence that the Trump team has been hiding from the other courts. - These desperadoes are telling everyone else to "sit back, watch and learn".

  13. #1393
    Join Date
    7th January 2014 - 14:45
    Bike
    Not a Hayabusa anymore
    Location
    Not Gulf Harbour Either
    Posts
    1,460
    Quote Originally Posted by sugilite View Post
    With nearly 40 - 40!!!! failed court cases and still no fraud proved is a veritable mountain of evidence to support there was in fact near 0% voter fraud, you are clinging on to a comparatively sized small grain of sand of a now deleted and debunked post. This is taking the defend your position at all costs to impressive new levels
    That wasn't the post I initially referenced - namely the claim in the Gettysburg hearing - If it's incorrect, then fair enough.

    Going back to the debunk though - there are some oddities in the numbers as they are presented in the debunk:

    Do you think it's reasonable to expect 100% or near 100% of unregistered mail-in voters to vote for Biden?
    Physics; Thou art a cruel, heartless Bitch-of-a-Mistress

  14. #1394
    Join Date
    8th January 2005 - 15:05
    Bike
    Triumph Speed Triple
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    10,080
    Blog Entries
    1
    This report concerns the arsehole Pennsylvania politician who was trying to get that state's 'electors' to vote for Trump at the Electoral College, against the will of the people of his state as determined by the election. I've mentioned him here a couple of times lately. Now he's in the news again for taking COVID to The White House..

    https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden...e476809a6b67db
    There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop

  15. #1395
    Join Date
    20th January 2010 - 14:41
    Bike
    husaberg
    Location
    The Wild Wild West
    Posts
    11,823
    About four in 10 registered voters plan to cast their ballot by mail-in voting (or have already done so), according to a Pew Research survey.

    Supporters of Democratic candidate Joe Biden overwhelmingly favor mail-in voting when compared to Trump supporters.

    Of the registered voters who plan to cast their ballot, 51% of Biden supporters say they will vote by mail, whereas 39% of Trump supporters said they will do the same. An estimated 50% of Trump supporters will vote in person on Election Day, whereas only 20% of Biden supporters plan to do the same.

    Despite the preference, Hall, who led the Stanford University study, tells DW that mail-in voting may not necessarily give Democrats a notable advantage.

    "Right now, a lot more Democrats than Republicans are voting by mail, but on its own, that won't inherently advantage the Democrats electorally because most of these Democratic voters would probably have voted in person if they didn't vote by mail," said Hall to DW.
    https://www.dw.com/en/us-election-ma...ump/a-55433216
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    I reminder distinctly .




    Kinky is using a feather. Perverted is using the whole chicken

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 28 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 28 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •