Biden

[husaberg]

[R650R]

Nostradamus Biden predicted 13 years ago what he would cause in Afghanistan....

[TheDemonLord]

Imma just leave this here:

https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/...96NFASXlK5NsCg

[sugilite:Me]

Imma just leave this here:

https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/...96NFASXlK5NsCg

Factual when compared to your guy who praises Putin just about any chance he gets. A bit of an own goal there bud.

[TheDemonLord]

Factual when compared to your guy who praises Putin just about any chance he gets. A bit of an own goal there bud.

I'd take praise of Invasion any day of the week.

Putin is clearly shaking in his little Ushanka at what Biden will do...

And here's your reminder - neither the Crimea nor Ukraine happened under Trump.

[sugilite:Me]

And here's your reminder - neither the Crimea nor Ukraine happened under Trump.

That literally means nothing.

A replacement health plan did not happen under trump either

[R650R]

That literally means nothing.

A replacement health plan did not happen under trump either

It means a lot when looney left say Trump was their puppet that the Russians installed via election fraud which apparently is not possible according to the left lol
Why didn’t Putin invade knowing his alleged pal trump would protect him?
Cause he knew Trump was real deal just like how North Korea stopped be idiots very quickly

Now we have basement t Biden and revelation of corrupt generals saying they would phone China before an attack....,

[TheDemonLord]

That literally means nothing.

A replacement health plan did not happen under trump either

Oh, it means a lot.

Here, from the Guardian (of all places)

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ne-white-house

[sugilite:Me]

It means a lot when looney left say Trump was their puppet that the Russians installed via election fraud which apparently is not possible according to the left lol
Why didn’t Putin invade knowing his alleged pal trump would protect him?
Cause he knew Trump was real deal just like how North Korea stopped be idiots very quickly

Now we have basement t Biden and revelation of corrupt generals saying they would phone China before an attack....,

How exactly does your rambling relate to my writing in your quote? "A replacement health plan did not happen under trump either"

[sugilite:Me]

Oh, it means a lot.

Here, from the Guardian (of all places)

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ne-white-house

Hold it right there, any time, and I mean ANY time I reference an article from the Guardian, you dismiss it out of hand. But surprise surprise, if it supports your argument, suddenly it is all good?

[TheDemonLord]

Hold it right there, any time, and I mean ANY time I reference an article from the Guardian, you dismiss it out of hand. But surprise surprise, if it supports your argument, suddenly it is all good?

Sure - anytime The Guardian says anything against the Right Wing or pro Left wing, it's your bog-standard biased as fuck left-wing fair.

However, when they have to begrudgingly admit something that is even tangentially pro-Trump and against the Left Wing, then you know that it's not coming from a Biased source.

I could post a billion and one Fox-Esque articles saying the same thing from various right-wing outlets, but when even the Guardian (which is practically Pravda at this point) has to acknowledge it...

[sugilite:Me]

Sure - anytime The Guardian says anything against the Right Wing or pro Left wing, it's your bog-standard biased as fuck left-wing fair.

However, when they have to begrudgingly admit something that is even tangentially pro-Trump and against the Left Wing, then you know that it's not coming from a Biased source.

I could post a billion and one Fox-Esque articles saying the same thing from various right-wing outlets, but when even the Guardian (which is practically Pravda at this point) has to acknowledge it...

OK, so any pro left anti right articles, swat em down, any pro right articles, super legit.

[TheDemonLord]

OK, so any pro left anti right articles, swat em down, any pro right articles, super legit.

Well, it's because you are accounting for and in this case going contrary to the editorial Bias.

[sugilite:Me]

Well, it's because you are accounting for and in this case going contrary to the editorial Bias.

Now we have established you are a keen guardian fan, here is an interesting article...

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...russia-ukraine

[TheDemonLord]

Now we have established you are a keen guardian fan, here is an interesting article...

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...russia-ukraine

I'm not a Guardian Fan, it's like when a Vegan says something positive about the Meat Industry - you know it's not coming from a place of ideological bias and since it's contrary to their core ideals - for them to admit it, it is more likely to be true.

However, back to the article - I've seen that sentiment expressed elsewhere - that having Buffer nations between world powers is a good thing.

I can't personally speak to the Ukraine as to whether they want to join NATO or not, but I have seen several instances (including the legendary Memeing from the official Twitter accounts) where Ukraine doesn't feel comfortable with a Russian relationship, given that during the period of the Soviet Union, it wasn't exactly 'Consensual'.

There also has to be an accounting of the Speech that Putin gave, where he points to the history of the region and some of the grievances felt by Russia (obvious caveat, they don't give a justification for War).