True - however there are a few institutions that for the most part have remained impartial and fair, some of them hundreds of years old. I don't think it's a 'Humans' issue per se, I think a big part of it is being careful about how the institution is run and the sorts of people that work in it.
This is, however, the very basis for the element of truth in the wider Conspiracy. If we bring this back to MJT - she raises this as a point, can cite specific examples and most people know it to be true on an instinctive level - so she says something that is true and then something that is wild speculation, the solution is to openly discuss (and maybe even Fix!) the problem and take the wind out of the sails of the 'extreme right'/
Speaking of - I saw that Trump has started using it, I suspect the Twitter acquisition has accelerated his plans. I saw on a conservative outlet the other day quite the criticism of the roll out of Truth ocial.
Which is fine - the Left have their set of Liars (whose biggest lie is that they are impartial) and the Right have their set of liars - the Public judges the truth with their viewership - and as you said - Fox is kicking CNN.
That's not even a close comparison. It's all sidestepping that there was a co-ordinated suppression of News, because it was damaging to one political side.
See, I'm not sure. Could you pay a Republican to adopt any of the Marxist pre-suppositions? I think not.
Not in those words, but calling it a white supremacist Capitalist patriarchy is close enough for me. As I said - any support of Marxist theories is antithetical to what the United States was founded on. They cannot co-exist.
Some of his political takes (for my tastes anyways) are still a bit too one-sided, but the more insane the radical left gets, the more he adjusts his tune.
I didn't say I believe it. I said that which is submitted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. And given the high degree of scrutiny, I think I'm more than justified in the demand for evidence.
This isn't Pomp - This is choice.
People make decisions and then there are consequences for those decisions. Choosing to live alone instead of flatting IS a choice, it has a cost and it has a benefit. Choosing to have children out of wedlock IS a choice, it has a cost and it has a benefit. Choosing to get divorced IS a choice, it has a cost and it has a benefit. Choosing to work in an entry level position, when you are 'middle aged and older' is a choice.
Now, I know some people who fit that description - they range from being retired but wanting an easy job that's stress free and gives them steak and beer money to having a partner that does all the heavy lifting and it keeps them out of trouble.
There are some people who you look at and you go 'wow, you really got unlucky' and for those I have a high degree of sympathy, there are others who when we look at their situation we see a number of choices that they made that led them to where they are now.
That, a reduction in GST and a reduction in the Fuel Tax would probably be the 3 biggest things that would help the poorest of the poor.
Guess which 3 things will never happen under a Labour Government.
Okay - serious question for a moment: What Supreme court decisions of late do you disagree with, in reference to the Constitution?
And I want to codify this: There are decisions that I might disagree with the decision, but I can concede that in reference to the Constitution and things like the English Bill of Rights and the Magna Carta, it is the 'correct' decision in reference to the law.
I've noticed this amongst US politicians in my lifetime, there are a few issues where IMO the correct way to address the issue is to set out to amend the Constitution.
The Dems weren't trying to Amend the constitution, I read the Act - it's full of Vomit inducing woke nonesense (some of which is patently untrue) - but the bit that I think raised the ire is that it said to allow Abortions after Fetal viability based on good-faith medical advice.
Which is very VERY open-ended. Especially when people like me (Fundamentally Pro-choice) are going - after Fetal Viability, that's a Human - and that Human has a right to life. Not only that, but the Medical science on this is generally accepted - at this point it is safer for an emergency C-Section than it is for a late-term abortion.
Or... One has a direct impact on the quality of my life (and is therefore of more pressing concern) and one does not.
Bookmarks