There's that dreaded "e" word again. No amout of classroom trailing will be better the experiance over a period of time.
Taking a group of riders through an area that was known to have bees, wasps etc around was absolutely stupid. What if a rider had a reaction if they got stung?
Out the back of Masterton riding with my visor completely down I had a bee come in my helment under the chin guard. Luckily for me it was quite happy to walk back and forth on the inside of the visor. I just slowed down a b, opened the visorr slowly a couple of inches and the bee figured out how to remove itself from inside my helmet.
Year or two back I went out to make sure I knew a route after work that I was taking somebody out on that coming weekend.
Made the mistake of having my dark visor on. It got dark so I lifted it. Pretty soon after a bug nailed me in the eye.
It didnt get better. I ended up at the Eye unit with a nice lady digging the bug remains out of my eye with a needle.
I cant say it was a fun time.
I do like a wee dredge..
The mention of scooters got me thinking, and trying to fix the wee wheels on me mulcher. Bastard things.. Mulcher wheels.
I ride a fair bit of dirt and the front chops out quite often but it's rarely a scenery tasting event.
So my pondering is that the bigger the front wheel the more time you have to react when losing teh traction? I've never seen a Penny-farthing tuck the front..
Or is their summit else going on?
Manopausal.
Bigger diameter is mostly for rolling over uneven terrain more easily, dealing with bumps etc. It's also slower steering (hence why you see testers comment on the big front wheel of adventure bikes on the road, whether they notice or not).
Narrower so it grips better, less likely to float on top of stuff.
Beyond that, you have configuration of the geometry, weight of the bike, how the manufacturer wants it to steer etc. For example, my R1200GSA loves to plow a trench with the front in rougher stuff, really hard work, turning the wheel simply made it want to fall over. Took the 1090R onto sand, and it was less inclined to dig the front in, and more likely to loft it onto the sand and made things so much easier. The BMW has a 110/80/19 and 150/70/17 combo, whereas the KTM has a 90/90/21 and 150/70/18 combo...
Originally Posted by Jane Omorogbe from UK MSN on the KTM990SM
So who’s practiced their emergency braking lately? Watching something on tube realised I hadn’t bothered in long time so on deserted rural road did several complete panic style stops with both brake controls from my normal cruising speed of a bit of spare change into tolerance zone on 200kg plus bike with ABS.
First stop was about 36m ish by completely unscientific paces from back of bike so about 40m prob, in simpler terms it was about 4 of the white centre line stripes. Later attempts were slightly better so yeah maybe doing more often is good idea.
Pretty sobering walking back to where you started and looking forward to where you did stop, looks strangely familiar to the distance you see wreckage scattered over and it looks further than you’d like. Anyhow have a go now and then…
Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer
Thing is, for practise you are eliminating reaction time. You know you are going to be braking, and probably even where. So reaction time isn't a factor.
In the real world, you don't get time to sit back and make a rational judgement as to the pros and cons of rear v front, the merits of the reason you have to brake, that sort of thing.
The point of repeated practise of good technique is to form muscle memory, so that when the doo hits the fan, you know what you'll do : you'll do what you have repeatedly taught yourself to do.
Unless you haven't bothered. Which significantly increases the chances that you'll snatch the front brake, lock the front wheel, and that you'll join the leagues of those who have visited the emergency room to have grit scrubbed from your flesh wounds.
Everyone thinks they know how to use the brakes. Because they don't know what they don't know. And nobody thinks their technique will let them down, until it does.
Was thinking the other day; what proportion of regularly used bikes these days are ABS?
Have we seen a reduction of accidents, or reduction of severity in those kind of accidents?
The Ancient Hurt report said that many people do nothing and plow into the object. Can't help them. Perhaps we have 3 groups more. Like Goldilocks let's call them the underbrakers, the over brakers, and the just right brakers..
The just right brakers are on the limit and are most likely to come off best.
The overbrakers will be saved from a lock up crash by ABS, and ABS has got so much better over the years, that they will probably be sitting level with the just right brakers.
That sounds great .
So that means the underbrakers need to practice to believe how much and how quickly they can apply the brake..
The do nothing group could also train to be prepared. A suspicious mind imagines other people's potential mistakes and is already having a plan and positioning themselves to brake, reducing reaction time greatly.
A surprise wastes a lot of time.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
It's one of the ironies of a good Ride Forever course, if delivered well.
We want people to be awesome at emergency braking, so that gets covered.
But the rest of the course is all about riding with awareness and anticipation, which mean you don't have to emergency brake.
Funny, I've practised emergency braking for years, but haven't had to use it for just as long.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks