
Originally Posted by
neels
The feeling seems to be that the reduction in scanning is because people are trying to avoid the restrictions associated with being identified as a contact, which presumably is what you are referring to as tyranny.
To be fair I get that, not wanting to be deemed a close contact just because you were at the opposite end of an aeroplane from someone who later tests positive, or if you're popping into the dairy for 5 minutes when you need to be exposed for 15 minutes without a mask to be considered a contact why bother.
Omicron is just the sniffles for some people, but not all of the people, otherwise there wouldn't be people in hospital. Whether that justifies the level of restrictions is a multi headed monster that can be debated forever without reaching an absolute conclusion.
A few things you may have missed (I did because I refuse to watch the daily propoganda show)
You are ONLY a close contact if in a bar/massage parlour/aeroplane etc eg lots of people confined space for long time.
Any normal shops supermarket dairy etc you are not a close contact even if there at same time, they only want you to get tested if you have symptoms in those occasions. So effectively scanning is redundant at all places except those mentioned in first place as by default a good citizen that believes in all this would get themselves tested if they had symptoms regardless of where they had been as per public health request.
If Adern and co had any brains at they would have realised this very obvious contradiction and removed the MANDATE to scan everywhere to only scan at businesses involving close intimate contact or nightclubs etc and then the protest never would have started.....
Towing starts at 6.30 tonight should be entertaining....
Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer
Bookmarks