On a Motorcycle you're penetrating distance, right along with the machine!! In a car you're just a spectator, the windshields like a TV!!
'Life's Journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out! Shouting, ' Holy sh!t... What a Ride!! '
Testing video from Barcelona for interests sakes:
"If a million people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing." - Anatole France
"An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you know and what you don't." - Anatole France
ZRXOA #9170
It looks like the KTM problems are starting to force change. The FIM is proposing a single bike 500cc/80hp Moto3.
ATM they're looking for someone to supply the complete bike - but Yamaha for one is only interested in engine supply.
It may well finish up like Moto2 with a single engine supplier.
I was interested to see that the current prototype class Moto3 bikes actually cost more than Moto2.
i appreciate the racing in moto 2 and moto3 but i cant get enthused in it .I think its becaue there is no "bike" .No brand to identify with. I rckon they need to go back to having different makes . Make moto 3 pretty basic but let moto 2 have some motogp like technology so there can be some learning of moto gp
That's single bike - not single cylinder. Pretty sure it would be a high revving twin or triple.
Moto3 currently does have "brands". Honda and KTM variants.
Moto2 with a spec engine and chassis from small suppliers - except again KTM - is undoubtedly cheaper.
I think the last thing any of us wants to see is MotoGP aero and complex electronics spread into the lower classes
I'd far rather see MotoGP bikes simplified. Less aero, no holeshot devices. Bigger rider's balls.
You then run into the problem that the bikes are too fast for some tracks. Spec traction control means aero needed to stop wheelie. Aero however drags bikes following dangerous like a game of skittles. Makes passing difficult.
I'd like exciting racing. It's a hard compromise.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
Multi-cylinder please for Moto3. A 4-stroke single just does not sound right.
Moto2 already has a spec engine (Triumph), and you need a Kalex chassis to win. There is limited electronics, traction control and engine mapping? They were louder than the MotoGP bikes at Phillip Island, possibly because they can use more throttle at that track.
Sent from my SM-S906E using Tapatalk
Yeah but there's not enough run off at some tracks as you pass 300 or whatever. Every 10km faster means you travel that much further and hit barriers with that much more speed and inevitability get that much more dead if allowed to continue. Hence 850 rule, but it's not the best way to attack the real world problem .
Tracks like Philip Island which e everyone loves is close to not viable.
Don't you look at my accountant.
He's the only one I've got.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks