Charlie Kirk

**Katman** · 23rd September 2025, 12:43

With the official story just getting weirder and weirder I figured Charlie deserved his own thread.

Apparently Charlie's bone density was so incredibly dense that it stopped a 30-06 round dead in it's tracks (sorry for the pun) and didn't exit his body.

Now I'm no ballistics expert but I've been watching a number of videos from people who are.

Is anyone out there buying this story?

**johcar** · 23rd September 2025, 13:14

The short video I watched of the actual shooting seemed to show blood spatter behind him, which suggests the bullet exited.

Sent from my CPH2449 using Tapatalk

**Katman** · 23rd September 2025, 13:18

Originally Posted by johcar

The short video I watched of the actual shooting seemed to show blood spatter behind him, which suggests the bullet exited.

Well, according to the surgeon, the bullet was found just under the skin.

**pritch** · 23rd September 2025, 13:47

Originally Posted by Katman

Well, according to the surgeon, the bullet was found just under the skin.

That would be the non-existent surgeon who if actually making that statement would be in breach of the law? (HIPAA)

Now people are theorising that if the bullet stopped just under the skin it must be a pistol bullet not a 30.06 round. Thus kick starting the second shooter theory.
The problem is that currently it's no use waiting for the official information from the FBI. Under the current regime their information has proven repeatedly to be unreliable.

Trump will be happy, this is keeping the Epstein list off the front page.

**Katman** · 23rd September 2025, 13:58

Originally Posted by pritch

That would be the non-existent surgeon who if actually making that statement would be in breach of the law? (HIPAA)

'Non-existent'???

Are you suggesting that no surgeon worked on Charlie Kirk at the hospital?

**pritch** · 23rd September 2025, 14:50

Originally Posted by Katman

'Non-existent'???

Are you suggesting that no surgeon worked on Charlie Kirk at the hospital?

No. I'm suggesting that the surgeon quoted is entirely fictional. It would be unprofessional not to mention illegal for a surgeon to comment like that. Well two of them actually 'cause the Coroner is also "quoted".

It's getting very difficult to sort the sugar from the shite coming out of the USA at the moment but I'm filing that one under shite. The surgeon did not speak to the press. One of Kirk's mates quoted the surgeon as saying that. Considering the amount of crap Kirk talked I'm assuming his mate is similarly unreliable.

For what it's worth the attachment is the source of this story.

**Katman** · 23rd September 2025, 15:19

Originally Posted by pritch

No. I'm suggesting that the surgeon quoted is entirely fictional. It would be unprofessional not to mention illegal for a surgeon to comment like that. Well two of them actually 'cause the Coroner is also "quoted".

It's getting very difficult to sort the sugar from the shite coming out of the USA at the moment but I'm filing that one under shite. The surgeon did not speak to the press. One of Kirk's mates quoted the surgeon as saying that. Considering the amount of crap Kirk talked I'm assuming his mate is similarly unreliable.

For what it's worth the attachment is the source of this story.

So what's your opinion on the no exit wound theory?

**pritch** · 23rd September 2025, 16:54

Originally Posted by Katman

So what's your opinion on the no exit wound theory?

I have no opinion really, there is no credible information on which to form an opinion. Way back when I was wearing green we were told that it would take a minimum eighteen inches of hard packed material to stop a 7.62 round. If using a tree for cover twenty four inches would be better. Ballistically the 30.06 is just slightly superior to the 7.62 so it seems highly unlikely a 30.06 bullet from 150 to 200 yards would stop in anybody's neck.

**pritch** · 23rd September 2025, 20:35

This guy doesn't know any more than we do but he takes a guess. At least it's a fairly educated guess.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XoHKCbX8oA

**jellywrestler** · 23rd September 2025, 20:45

Originally Posted by Katman

Apparently Charlie's bone density was so incredibly dense that it stopped a 30-06 round dead in it's tracks (sorry for the pun) and didn't exit his body.

reports i read said it hit the arteries in his neck, they are in the sides rather than in the spine, which is where the bone is. Would you like someone to send you a picture of the layout?

**Katman** · 24th September 2025, 08:25

Originally Posted by jellywrestler

reports i read said it hit the arteries in his neck, they are in the sides rather than in the spine, which is where the bone is.

Which highlights the absurdity of the suggestion that, in this particular instance, a 30-06 round would not create an exit wound.

**pritch** · 24th September 2025, 12:54

I just watched some dude with a number of rifles decorating the wall behind him explain what little we know and then come to the conclusion there was a second shooter.
All we need now is a grassy knoll.

All sorts of 'experts" are making their guesses known. At least two are sure Kirk was shot from behind, the wound on his neck being the exit wound. There was no explanation of where the bullet went after hitting Kirk.

Interestingly in one video clip Kirk's wife said, "I saw Charlies' wounds." Wounds plural.

Things may get more confusing before we get clarity. If we ever get clarity.