Originally Posted by thehollowmen
A claim is a claim.
It cost money to process even if nought was paid.
BTW - The money didn't have to repaid. He could have given the recovered stuff back instead.
Originally Posted by thehollowmen
A claim is a claim.
It cost money to process even if nought was paid.
BTW - The money didn't have to repaid. He could have given the recovered stuff back instead.
But unless he has a $0 excess, and a policy that guarantees full replacement cost, he'd loose out doing that.Originally Posted by Oscar
.
Good point.Originally Posted by LiasTZ
Actually, being as how the excess is defined as the first part of the loss, he'd be within his rights to withhold goods to the value of the excess.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks