No Mangell,Originally Posted by mangell6
In the interview that Mel Gibson did with Diane Sawyer they also had a minister or some such type saying about how he found the level of violence in the movie really offensive and said something about how it wasn't written that way in the bible ie. with a violent description. Therefore he was kiinda saying that Mel Gibson'd version of it was OTT b/c the bible doesn't have all that detail.
So what I was saying (as the lovely Mel himself stated) was that crucifiction isn't a pretty thing and of course it would have been very violent and nasty.
Does that make sense? Is that what you were wanted clarified or have I missed the point entirley?![]()
But, I guess what you have said is what happened sometimes and I think still happens today...sometimes, in certain parts of the world at least.![]()
Bookmarks