
Originally Posted by
Madness
You mean like someone who's previoulsy had their wing mirror clipped by a poorly splitting motorcyclist?

If damage was done then I agree. However, "no harn, no foul". Even if a driver's mirror has been previously removed by a biker they have no foundation to take offence over a genuine mistake that leaves no damage.

Originally Posted by
Katman
And I suppose you have no problem with people who can't push a supermarket trolley through a carpark without playing Pinball with the parked cars?
As long as that trolley leaves no marks and does no other damage, I have no problem at all. The fact of the matter is that two mirrors clipping would seldom do any damage at all. I would have a problem in the rare cases where damage is done if the biker makes no attempt to put things right.

Originally Posted by
Katman
To clip a wing mirror while filtering shows a distinct lack of skill.
No argument here. That's what defines a novice. Do you expect that we're all born consumate lane-splitters? I know I clipped a mirror two in the early stages. Haven't touched one for years now.

Originally Posted by
Katman
But to then defend the action as something of no consequence is morally repugnant.
As I said, no harm, no foul. Accept that we are human and, as such, fallible; especially in the "novice" stages.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
Bookmarks