
Originally Posted by
Madness
Completely different.
The increased risk for each is only that percieved in the eyes of those that are compelled to try and control the uncontrollable.

Originally Posted by
Madness
I'm no Lawyer but after having spent many a day sitting in traffic Courts in a previous life I believe I have a good understanding of the nature of the charge.
While you may be technically correct, to charge someone with careless for a low speed tap would just illustrate what I'm referrng to when I talk about safety zealots.

Originally Posted by
Madness
To clip the wing mirror of another vehicle is quite obviously operating a vehicle in a manner below that of a prudent driver.
A prudent "driver" would not lanesplit simply because of the girth that comes with four wheels. However, a prudent rider will ride between traffic when it is appropriate. By its very nature lane-splitting puts the rider within range of a car's wing mirror. The rider is not even necessarily at fault. If the car moved towards the bike they may be at fault for moving into another vehicle that was legally sharing the lane.

Originally Posted by
Madness
I should add that Mr Branetts reaction is hardly surprising
Due to the ever increasing number of people in this world that think it's not OK to be human. People cock up. They always have and always will. Nothing you or anyone else can do is going to change that. The only reasonable option is to get used to it.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
Bookmarks