
Originally Posted by
Madness
If lane-splitting is safer than riding in the queue then why isn't the practice taught to learners as part of the licencing system?
Lane-splitting can be safer than staying in traffic when done with the appropriate levels of skill and respect (for the risks, not for the other drivers; although that certainly doesn't hurt). Rank novices have neither. I agree with those here that say that riders should not be encouraged to lane-split before they are ready.

Originally Posted by
Madness
The simple fact that you and a few others think it's safer to ride with 500mm or so between you & other vehicles than it is to ride with several metres gap does not mean splitting is safer.
No argument here.

Originally Posted by
Madness
Mr Branett is one of the biggest fuckwits on this forum who thinks it's quite acceptable behaviour to clip the wing mirrors of other vehicles
I had a feeling you'd completely missed the point of that other thread.

Originally Posted by
Madness
Again, what facts are the claims that splitting is safer based on?
I can only speak for myself but my asertion is not that lane-splitting IS safer than sitting in line with traffic. It is that it CAN be as safe or better if done with an appropriate level of skill and respect.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
Bookmarks