Page 16 of 102 FirstFirst ... 614151617182666 ... LastLast
Results 226 to 240 of 1522

Thread: Lane splitting/filtering: the legal and commonsense answers

  1. #226
    Join Date
    26th September 2008 - 16:46
    Bike
    1997 Honda VTR1000F Firestorm
    Location
    North Shore City
    Posts
    1,439
    Quote Originally Posted by FROSTY View Post
    Just to be clear the origonal post was specificly talking about Motorway traffic or similar. Splitting lanes with oncoming traffic to me is like playing russian rulette--eventually you will get hit. You arent talking about adjusting to a 5-25 km./h speed difference you are dEALING WITH UP TO A 200KM/H SPEED DIFFFERENCE
    I agree
    Massive differences in speed and potential damage. Also a huge additional number of factors that could happen, including:

    - opposing car moving onto the white line to trurn right (he would be trying to get out of the way of cars behind him, but making life REAAL scary for you coming the other way). Speed difference up to 130km/hr
    -opposing car moving onto white line to pass a car in his lane turning left. speed difference up to 220kkm/hr

    These two scenarios happen frequently and are not "exceptions" to look out for. Looking at the risk management aspect of it (i.e. probability of it happening in percentage i.e. about 20% X by the effective result scaled from 1 to 10 - which is pretty much death for a rating of 1), you get 0.1x1 = 0.2 (or about 20% chance of death). That is significantly higher than I am prepared to go. And damn close to russian roulette.

    Looking at lane splitting in two lanes going the same way:

    Chance of car pulling out is quite high- maybe 30%, but the effect is lower - as the relative speeds are lower. And the rsik of a car pulling out is reduced by cautious riding between the lanes. The lower the relative speeds, the less chance of a car pulling out in front of you that you can't brake for. Whereas you would find it pretty much impossible to brake for a car pulling onto the white line going the other way.
    So the weighting is about .3 for effect/resultant damge (by my thumbs suck).

    Of course you also have the chance of being run over by following cars, but -I hope - this is low. So by my reckoning total weighting is .2x.3= .06


    Thats about a quarter the risk of the first example. Still not great, I admit. But nobody said that lane splitting was safe.

    Now I have chucked my figures into the pot, I expect a massive debate on them...
    Last edited by R-Soul; 15th February 2010 at 08:44. Reason: crappy typing
    The one thing man learns from history is that man does not learn from history
    Calvin and Hobbes: The surest sign of intelligent life out there is that it has not tried to contact us.
    Its easier to apologise than ask for permission.
    Wise words:
    Quote Originally Posted by quickbuck View Post
    It could be that I have one years experience repeated 33 times!

  2. #227
    Join Date
    4th October 2008 - 16:35
    Bike
    R1250GS
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    10,240
    Quote Originally Posted by R Sole View Post
    I agree
    Massive differences in speed and potential damage. Also a huge additional number of factors that could happen, including:

    - opposing car moving onto the white line to trurn right (he would be trying to get out of the way of cars behind him, but making life REAAL scary for you coming the other way). Speed difference up to 130km/hr
    -opposing car moving onto white line to pass a car in his lane turning left. speed difference up to 220kkm/hr

    These two scenarios happen frequently and are not "exceptions" to look out for. Looking at the risk management aspect of it (i.e. probability of it happening in percentage i.e. about 20% X by the effective result scaled from 1 to 10 - which is pretty much death for a rating of 1), you get 0.1x1 = 0.2 (or about 20% chance of death). That is significantly higher than I am prepared to go. And damn close to russian roulette.

    Looking at lane splitting in two lanes going the same way:

    Chance of car pulling out is quite high- maybe 30%, but the effect is lower - as the relative speeds are lower. And the rsik of a car pulling out is reduced by cautious riding between the lanes. The lower the relative speeds, the less chance of a car pulling out in front of you that you can't brake for. Whereas you would find it pretty much impossible to brake for a car pulling onto the white line going the other way.
    So the weighting is about .3 for effect/resultant damge (by my thumbs suck).

    Of course you also have the chance of being run over by following cars, but -I hope - this is low. So by my reckoning total weighting is .2x.3= .06


    Thats about a quarter the risk of the first example. Still not great, I admit. But nobody said that lane splitting was safe.

    Now I have chucked my figures into the pot, I expect a massive debate on them...
    i disagree witrhthe risk of lane splitting error with traffic going the same way.If you or the car misjudge and you touch i would say you are likely to go down and almost certainly run over by either one of the cars behind you....or even the ones beside you

  3. #228
    Join Date
    26th September 2008 - 16:46
    Bike
    1997 Honda VTR1000F Firestorm
    Location
    North Shore City
    Posts
    1,439
    Quote Originally Posted by BMWST? View Post
    i disagree witrhthe risk of lane splitting error with traffic going the same way.If you or the car misjudge and you touch i would say you are likely to go down and almost certainly run over by either one of the cars behind you....or even the ones beside you
    I agree it could happen. But because of teh relative speeds being less, there is larger chance of evasive action by a car having some effect. i.e. they have more chance to swerve/brake.

    You also have more chance to swerve or brake before you hit another car.

    Having said that, the other day I was lane splitting and as I was just behind the line of a car's boot, they put their indicator on, and started moving across. Whereas 9 times out of 10, the bike would be able to see it and brake/accelerate to get out of trouble, this was different. The timing of it was perfect (ly bad), and did not leave me with much option. I started braking hard, and may have made it, but not sure. It was all at innocuous speeds, and seemed to be in slow motion. But the physics of it left me with no options but to rely on the car driver (scary scenario).
    Luckily she looked over her shoulder and saw me, and stayed in her lane. It can and will happen. That is why you need to be especially diligent when a gap opens up in the lane alongside. Only pass cars when there are no gaps.
    The one thing man learns from history is that man does not learn from history
    Calvin and Hobbes: The surest sign of intelligent life out there is that it has not tried to contact us.
    Its easier to apologise than ask for permission.
    Wise words:
    Quote Originally Posted by quickbuck View Post
    It could be that I have one years experience repeated 33 times!

  4. #229
    Join Date
    8th July 2009 - 14:02
    Bike
    R1150RT
    Location
    The Nest
    Posts
    4,694
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by FROSTY View Post
    Just to be clear the origonal post was specificly talking about Motorway traffic or similar. Splitting lanes with oncoming traffic to me is like playing russian rulette--eventually you will get hit. You arent talking about adjusting to a 5-25 km./h speed difference you are dEALING WITH UP TO A 200KM/H SPEED DIFFFERENCE
    With opposing traffic it ain't splitting it's insanity.

  5. #230
    Join Date
    13th January 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Honda PC800
    Location
    Henderson -auckland
    Posts
    14,163
    ONLY time I'd ndo it is gridlock both ways.
    To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?

  6. #231
    Join Date
    10th December 2009 - 17:06
    Bike
    Geriatric Kwakas + dragqueen hyperscoot
    Location
    Planet Duct Tape
    Posts
    1,084
    Handy to be able to move up to the front of a que when waiting at lights. Maybe in VERY slow moving traffic I'd consider it. Too risky otherwise, I dont have the balls for it...actually I dont have balls at all
    feralconnection Ltd
    Leather lettering and seat rebuilds
    Gear alterations and repairs
    PM me and lets talk
    !

  7. #232
    Join Date
    2nd December 2007 - 20:00
    Bike
    Baby Gixxer
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,503
    Blog Entries
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by Ratti View Post
    Handy to be able to move up to the front of a que when waiting at lights. Maybe in VERY slow moving traffic I'd consider it. Too risky otherwise, I dont have the balls for it...actually I dont have balls at all
    you and me both honey!
    I only split when the gap is one that will 99.9% guarantee me a nick-free (or is that knock-free) tootle through. I see plenty of bikes splitting through as I patiently stay in my lane - you see lotsa cute rear views! (then just have to make sure you don't stare at them to the point you run up the jacksy of the car in front eeeek)
    I lahk to moove eet moove eet...

    Katman to steveb64
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    I'd hate to ever have to admit that my arse had been owned by a Princess.

  8. #233
    Join Date
    7th January 2006 - 02:13
    Bike
    Kawasaki Drifter 800cc
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    162
    Blog Entries
    7
    This is one thing that is rarely done where I live. I have never seen it done here, but I have seen it in Europe and U.S.A and it is quite a normal thing, the cagers in those countries are aware to watch for motorcycles who are land splitting.
    Live Love Laugh
    my fitness page

  9. #234
    Join Date
    5th February 2008 - 13:07
    Bike
    2006 Hyosung GT650R
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    7,141
    Interesting to hear folks feelings on this.

    Yes I concede turning traffic is a risk, particularly so when their movements are rash and unannounced. Mind you, any rash and unannounced movements on the road are tantamount to dangerous driving, particularly in a group of swiftly moving vehicles.

    For anyones' use, I made myself a few rules when lane sharing into oncoming traffic ;

    Know the traffic. If you don't like the way they are behaving - don't pass.

    Don't make gaps. If there's no gap, don' try and force one. Let them pull over for you, then go. Thank them with a wave.

    Don't pass where they can pass. If they can pass, quite likely they will, so don't chance it.

    Keep your speed differential down. Self explanatory.

    No hard braking. The centreline has gravel all over it. Don't brake hard on it or pay the price.

    Always remember, theres loads more room on the centreline that you think, so don't panic and bash the brakes.

    Be careful out there.

    Steve
    "I am a licenced motorcycle instructor, I agree with dangerousbastard, no point in repeating what he said."
    "read what Steve says. He's right."
    "What Steve said pretty much summed it up."
    "I did axactly as you said and it worked...!!"
    "Wow, Great advise there DB."
    WTB: Hyosung bikes or going or not.

  10. #235
    Join Date
    21st December 2006 - 14:36
    Bike
    Mine
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    3,966
    Quote Originally Posted by R Sole View Post
    But the physics of it left me with no options but to rely on the car driver (scary scenario).
    You could go around the front.

    I've been in the exact scenario that you describe except that the car driver did not see me. I rolled on the power while falling in to an extreme right lean. If I'd stayed this way I would've low-sided in under the car so I flipped to a left lean and scraped past the front of the car. The right corner of the front bumber folded up my foot peg and left a scratch in my left muffler.
    "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)

    "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)

    "Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous

    "Live to Ride, Ride to Live"

  11. #236
    Join Date
    21st December 2006 - 14:36
    Bike
    Mine
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    3,966
    Quote Originally Posted by Brownbabe View Post
    land splitting.
    Do you tow a plough with your bike?
    "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)

    "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)

    "Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous

    "Live to Ride, Ride to Live"

  12. #237
    Join Date
    21st December 2006 - 14:36
    Bike
    Mine
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    3,966
    Quote Originally Posted by DangerousBastard View Post
    No hard braking. The centreline has gravel all over it.
    Not to mention long stretches of white (or yellow) paint.
    "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)

    "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)

    "Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous

    "Live to Ride, Ride to Live"

  13. #238
    Join Date
    2nd August 2008 - 08:57
    Bike
    '23 CRF 1100
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    2,488
    Quote Originally Posted by R Sole View Post
    I
    Having said that, the other day I was lane splitting and as I was just behind the line of a car's boot, they put their indicator on, and started moving across. Whereas 9 times out of 10, the bike would be able to see it and brake/accelerate to get out of trouble, this was different. The timing of it was perfect (ly bad), and did not leave me with much option. I started braking hard, and may have made it, but not sure. It was all at innocuous speeds, and seemed to be in slow motion. But the physics of it left me with no options but to rely on the car driver (scary scenario).
    Luckily she looked over her shoulder and saw me, and stayed in her lane.
    If you had been really lucky it would have been one of those very rare drivers that indicates at least 3 seconds before changing lanes - then you would have had plenty of time.
    ----------------------------------------------------
    Quote Originally Posted by PrincessBandit View Post
    I realised that having 105kg of man sliding into my rear was a tad uncomfortable
    "If the cops didn't see it, I didn't do it!"
    - George Carlin (RIP)

  14. #239
    Join Date
    6th February 2009 - 12:35
    Bike
    hot mini moto
    Location
    New Windsor
    Posts
    73
    I saw something happen at the lights that i've never seen before the traffic was thick right up to the lights so this person on a motor bike decided not to wait till the lights turned green he just drove up on the foot path was quite a way to the lights I thought to myself not setting a good example for learners and very dangerous for pedistrians and ilegal

  15. #240
    Join Date
    26th September 2008 - 16:46
    Bike
    1997 Honda VTR1000F Firestorm
    Location
    North Shore City
    Posts
    1,439
    Quote Originally Posted by Ladydragon View Post
    I saw something happen at the lights that i've never seen before the traffic was thick right up to the lights so this person on a motor bike decided not to wait till the lights turned green he just drove up on the foot path was quite a way to the lights I thought to myself not setting a good example for learners and very dangerous for pedistrians and ilegal
    Yeah thats pretty shocking. And dangerous.
    The one thing man learns from history is that man does not learn from history
    Calvin and Hobbes: The surest sign of intelligent life out there is that it has not tried to contact us.
    Its easier to apologise than ask for permission.
    Wise words:
    Quote Originally Posted by quickbuck View Post
    It could be that I have one years experience repeated 33 times!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •