Got a call yesterday morning that the springs were ready, so I went today and picked them up.
I'd asked for 32mm dia, 373mm long and 0.95kg/mm springs. The engineer guy I talked to said he'd make the length 375mm, I guess just to round it up. Anyway, the length came out at exactly 373mm on the one I measured and the other looked the same, so I'm not sure if I misunderstood or if it was just a fluke.
I'd said the diameter had to be no larger than 32mm, that they needed to work inside a 32.9mm tube. But when I measured the new spring dia, it was 32.5mm!
Luckily it seems ok with just the 0.4mm clearance.
The new springs are a fair bit heavier than the old ones, weighing 600g each compared to 400g for the originals. Not that this has any significant effect as far as I can see.
Anyway, I put them in the bike and there's a huge difference, the front feels way firmer and nicer. Not too hard though, I think.
It's funny though, the second rate of the original springs was 0.95kg/mm, the same as the new ones. But there was about 8mm travel of the first rate from the laden position.
I don't know if it's the 8mm travel that made the difference, or if the original springs weakened since I last measured them (just after cutting them, a year or more ago, iirc. I should measure them again). I measured the rate on the new springs and came up with 0.96kg/mm but I don't think that'd be noticeable plus my measurements might have been slightly out.
Since the new springs were the exact length I asked for I was able to put them straight in with the original steel spacers which was nice. It's way easier putting single rate springs in than dual rate springs.
Bookmarks