Got a call yesterday morning that the springs were ready, so I went today and picked them up.
I'd asked for 32mm dia, 373mm long and 0.95kg/mm springs. The engineer guy I talked to said he'd make the length 375mm, I guess just to round it up. Anyway, the length came out at exactly 373mm on the one I measured and the other looked the same, so I'm not sure if I misunderstood or if it was just a fluke.
I'd said the diameter had to be no larger than 32mm, that they needed to work inside a 32.9mm tube. But when I measured the new spring dia, it was 32.5mm!
Luckily it seems ok with just the 0.4mm clearance.
The new springs are a fair bit heavier than the old ones, weighing 600g each compared to 400g for the originals. Not that this has any significant effect as far as I can see.
Anyway, I put them in the bike and there's a huge difference, the front feels way firmer and nicer. Not too hard though, I think.
It's funny though, the second rate of the original springs was 0.95kg/mm, the same as the new ones. But there was about 8mm travel of the first rate from the laden position.
I don't know if it's the 8mm travel that made the difference, or if the original springs weakened since I last measured them (just after cutting them, a year or more ago, iirc. I should measure them again). I measured the rate on the new springs and came up with 0.96kg/mm but I don't think that'd be noticeable plus my measurements might have been slightly out.
Since the new springs were the exact length I asked for I was able to put them straight in with the original steel spacers which was nice. It's way easier putting single rate springs in than dual rate springs.




Reply With Quote




Bookmarks