
Originally Posted by
Winston001
AHA - you fell into my wily trap. This "Auckland is the powerhouse of NZ" nonsence has been around for a while. It is repeated faithfully and non-critically by journalists until it has become an article of faith.
It isn't true. NZ's wealth comes from agriculture, fishing, forestry, and tourism. Of those only tourism involves Auckland. Our ability to import oil, cars, computers, machinery etc etc is only possible because we as a nation earn foreign exchange.
I'm not saying Auckland doesn't contribute but it is small-time compared to the provinces.
Tell me of anything essential which I can't get locally or directly from overseas. At present Auckland is the default because so many companies have moved head offices there. But in truth, those offices could be in Sydney or Christchurch for all the difference they make.
Nothing wrong with Auckland or the Kiwis who live there. It's a shame they are living an illusion.

Auckland is the powerhouse in terms of providing the taxes and levies that enable subsidies to the farmers and the fisheries to be given to Iwis. Auckland also supplies welfare to the forestry workers laid off as the forestry industry capitulates to cheap wood pulp from Asia.
What you can't get locally is enough tax dollars to pay for your highways and power generation
What the provences need to realise is that producing primary commodities is no longer a stable base for an economy.
As for moving head offices to Sydney - you are too correct. My company just moved a large number of roles there today
"No one appreciates the very special genius of your conversation as the dog does."
Bookmarks