Originally Posted by sAsLEX
True. Dunno if he chose to keep or not to keep, but it would be the other way around if he kept, then she would be paying.
Originally Posted by sAsLEX
True. Dunno if he chose to keep or not to keep, but it would be the other way around if he kept, then she would be paying.
Sorry matey but ya need to think about the Kids and not you in these situations......you had kids so you cannot deny them now.
Sorry....
Actually....since 2004 things have changed and when a couple seperate you get automatic equal shared custody without having to go to Court....obviously if there is domestic violence etc then the Family Court decide.Originally Posted by sAsLEX
Wash your bike you dirty whore!!!!!
Tread Carefully Im liable to explode anytime.Originally Posted by crashe
yes your right i do bring Kids into this world and he is my world, I would fight to pay for his up keep, you better believe it, unfortunetly people do break up, nothing like a knife implanted in oneself to encourage that eh ?
Yes someone does have to pay someONE and that one has to pay alot.
I pay $750, I dont mind saying that, yes im on a good income so what good for me !
How do you consider that a child cost this much.... lets break it down
1/ Food one child eating really really well 80.00 a week ?
2/ Clothes a item each week $50 a week
3/ School requirements $20 a week ?
4/ child Health insurance $10 a week
Total $550 and thats one spoilt little kid (I dont cost that much)
So I pay $750 how is that figured out ? should it not be 50/50 thereby making a $1500 cost?
Where is her contribution ?
Why is her income not assesed ? its alot more than mine
Why is the fact that I have him every other weekend not considered ?
Why is the fact I have him for holidays not considered ?
Why am I
1/ penalised by not being able to share custody (cause Im a man?)
2 further penalised by paying a HUGE financal levy each month
THIS IS WRONG, its a complete fuckin jack up by lefty motherfuckers !!
I have ZERO respect for any mother that SUCKS an amount of money from a ex like this.
Hey and I know guys paying $1500 a month HOWS THAT ????
yes boys marry wisely and dont have kids the IRD will tax you for it
ADMIN review, that is a JOKE, your ex gets all your financla details then you sit with a fucken hairy armed pitted lefty tree hugging sandal wearing braless bitch that takes delight watching you quiver in your seat for the crime of being a MAN.
Family Court ? read above
Been there done that !!
in about two days I will be back to normal calm and collected once I get over the IRD inserting their RODS OF CORRUPT AUTHORITY UP MY ARSE !!!!
Ive run out of fucks to give
In the same boat here...wouldnt worry about the amount, if it all went to the kids.
"Ability hits the mark where presumption overshoots and diffidence falls short". Nicholas of Cusa
fooooook me.. that's a lotta mula to dish out every month..
Thing is, if you had custody, would she have to pay that to you?
*adds fuel*
tried custody, Im a man....... screwed by defaultOriginally Posted by sAsLEX
Ive run out of fucks to give
Whos fucken denying them ?Originally Posted by Grahameeboy
Ok lets think about the child in our care and the disproportionate amount we spend on the child not in our care.
Lets think about the impact on our family?
lets think about the $200K + income and my $750 for the other family and the lifestyle variations ?
Ive run out of fucks to give
Quasi I want to be your kid I also want 1500 a month to spend on myself!!!!!
This is the problem with left wing fucking social tree huging fuckwits (now you have me angry as well) that make decisions for others.My wife and I is sitting with the same (not realy the same but still ) bullshit from imigrations. A not born in nz person is making a desicion on if my wife (diabetic) can stay in the country her tax a year is more than the average income but still she will be a burden on the nz goverment YEAH FUCKEN RIGHT she's going to go on the doll. O yes what are we talking about again?
Second is the fastest loser
"It is better to have ridden & crashed than never to have ridden at all" by Bruce Bennett
DB is the new Porridge. Cause most of the mods must be sucking his cock ..... Or his giving them some oral help? How else can you explain it?
Labour basicallyOriginally Posted by enigma51
so trueOriginally Posted by sAsLEX
but yet so funny
![]()
Second is the fastest loser
"It is better to have ridden & crashed than never to have ridden at all" by Bruce Bennett
DB is the new Porridge. Cause most of the mods must be sucking his cock ..... Or his giving them some oral help? How else can you explain it?
We are not all evil (ex wives) I think the child support system is really unfair, so I came to a private arrangement with my ex to pay me $50 a week - not the $100 ++ tax dept was going to take off him.
Sorry, you didn't give much detail when you started which your more recent thread does do and I agree that you should only pay a % for Kids care if ex has a job etc....the difference may cover 'Living Standards'.....Originally Posted by Quasievil
But if you earn $200k a year........not all of us come close to that so I guess you have greater means than 90% of population.
Can you not use the Family Court to set up a new parenting agreement. This way you would be able to reduce your payments to ex...so you would feel better and you would have your kids half the week....assuming you want that.
I am in the same boat plus more complex issues.
Quasi - I feel your pain. I had ALL the same questions etc back in 1985-1990. My x was on DPB and I dare say got more than I, then a chunk of mine was surgically removed at source with no credit for regular & extended access. Nothing's changed. And yes, Labour was it when it started for me too.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
I agree....my ex is not evil......the Law has changed a bit since 2004 I think and I guess the main issue for some guys is that their custody is out of proportion to the support they pay....as I said before since 2004 the custody Law has changed so I guess this impacts of what child benefit is paid..........Originally Posted by magicfairy
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks