Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: For Lou, something to warm your heart.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    10th December 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    Shanksters Pony
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,647

    For Lou, something to warm your heart.

    Enjoy.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/manawat...1a6003,00.html

    The "little guy" won in Feilding District Court yesterday.

    Paul Blencoe, a Feilding moving consultant, refused to pay an $80 speeding ticket issued on October 7, 2005 by Palmerston North Police Inspector Dave Scott, on the grounds he wasn't speeding.

    An infringement notice sent a few days later said Mr Blencoe had been clocked at 113km on Campbell Road, between Feilding and Bunnythorpe.

    Mr Blencoe, who represented himself in court yesterday, argued he didn't exceed 100km, even when overtaking four cars along the stretch of Campbell Road.

    Insp Scott, who was driving on Waughs Road, which runs parallel to Campbell Road with the railway line between, said he paced Mr Blencoe for 650 metres before flashing his lights for him to stop at the Bunnythorpe petrol station.

    Mr Blencoe argued the infringement notice details - date of birth, colour of car, date the fine was issued, and the clothing he was wearing - were incorrect.

    He also argued the certified speedometer in Insp Scott's car had a significant margin of error (at least 2km) - enough to put him over the speed limit - if he was within the legal range of 100 to 109km.

    Obstruction between the parallel roads, with a railway embankment and willow trees, would have made it difficult for Insp Scott to successfully pace him, Mr Blencoe said.

    Insp Scott said his view was unimpeded.

    Insp Scott also failed to formally introduce himself as a police officer, Mr Blencoe said.

    Justices Morris Jackson and Norman Pearce dismissed the charge of failure to pay a fine and said Mr Blencoe deserved the "benefit of the doubt".

  2. #2
    Join Date
    25th October 2002 - 12:00
    Bike
    Old Blue, Little blue
    Location
    31.29.57.11, 116.22.22.22
    Posts
    4,863
    I suppose he even denied he was Paul Blencoe.

    If you are going for small margins and are following, it easy to get it wrong, but,what "legal range of 100-109"! - I thought the limit was 100!
    “- He felt that his whole life was some kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.”

  3. #3
    Join Date
    13th March 2006 - 20:49
    Bike
    TF125
    Location
    Hurunui, FTW!
    Posts
    4,430
    Obviously Inspectors have a quota to reach also then I take it???

    What a fucking waste of time and money!!!!!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    10th December 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    Shanksters Pony
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,647
    Quote Originally Posted by SPman
    but,what "legal range of 100-109"! - I thought the limit was 100!
    Exactly. I wonder how he would feel about receiving a ticket for 109, if that is what he's admitted to in court?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    20th November 2002 - 03:11
    Bike
    Registered. For now...
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    1,627
    Quote Originally Posted by MAXIMUSDEMERITUS
    What a fucking waste of time and money!!!!!
    But then, if everyone was to exercise their right to defend a speeding charge in court, the court system would collapse within a week, and the govt would be forced to re-think their "road safety" strategy. Or they could remove the right to defense, but that would also remove them from power quite quickly.

    Quote Originally Posted by spudchucka
    Exactly. I wonder how he would feel about receiving a ticket for 109, if that is what he's admitted to in court?
    Now, that would be funny.
    ACC - It's where the Enron accountants all went.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    10th December 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    Shanksters Pony
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,647
    Quote Originally Posted by What?
    But then, if everyone was to exercise their right to defend a speeding charge in court, the court system would collapse within a week, and the govt would be forced to re-think their "road safety" strategy. Or they could remove the right to defense, but that would also remove them from power quite quickly.
    It wouldn't have any effect on the court system at all. Defended speeding tickets are heard before JP traffic court, not a district court judge. All that would happen is that you would end up waiting forever to have your case heard because of the back log. The district court would continue on without any adverse effect on its loading.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    Thank you Spud. It shows what's possible with determination.
    The JP's do hear traffic matters, but if people then appealed guilty verdicts THAT would cause a headache or three.
    Speed doesn't kill people.
    Stupidity kills people.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    10th December 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    Shanksters Pony
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,647
    Quote Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
    Thank you Spud. It shows what's possible with determination.
    The JP's do hear traffic matters, but if people then appealed guilty verdicts THAT would cause a headache or three.
    And more than a few purses to empty. I think I'd be off to lawyer school if that ever happened. $$$$$$$

  9. #9
    Join Date
    25th November 2005 - 09:20
    Bike
    PX200 Vespa
    Location
    Welly
    Posts
    172
    awesome. local etc. haha, i drive that road twice a day

  10. #10
    Join Date
    20th November 2002 - 03:11
    Bike
    Registered. For now...
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    1,627
    Quote Originally Posted by spudchucka
    It wouldn't have any effect on the court system at all. Defended speeding tickets are heard before JP traffic court, not a district court judge. All that would happen is that you would end up waiting forever to have your case heard because of the back log. The district court would continue on without any adverse effect on its loading.
    True, the district courts would not feel it, but the JP's sure would (but who does the admin? It used to be the DC's). And as you noted, it would take forever to have your case heard. Considering the number of defenses now, and how long it takes to be heard, I would guess that if everyone chose to defend, it would not be long before there was no chance of being heard before the expiration of your natural life. Much like getting "non-essential" surgery in a public hospital.
    ACC - It's where the Enron accountants all went.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •