Nukes??

[Jackrat]

So are the Yanks gonn'a nuke Iran???

[Two Smoker]

So are the Yanks gonn'a nuke Iran???

Yeah... Old Bush is a bit scary... World War Three aye??? Even if there is no nukes and Bush invades Iran, there will still be hell!!!

[Jantar]

The war began years ago when the combined Islamic nations, headed by Iran, called for a Jihad. Maybe the yanks will respond, but it will be a boring war if they don't.

Will it come to nukes? if Iran get their nuke program running then it definitely will, but the big question is still: "who will nuke whom first?"

[Hitcher]

The man (George W Bush) is certifiably insane. Apparently swathes of CIA operatives have already been deployed to subvert the Iranian masses to rise up against their government. Clearly the man has no idea of cause and effect. And then people wonder why the Iranians may want to develop their own nuclear weapons?

And it wouldn't be WWIII. The Yanks would have no allies anywhere else in the world if they pulled such a stunt. It would be the muslim world versus the USA. If Mr Bush thinks he is currently fighting a "war on terror", the consequences of a precipitous and unprovoked action against Iran would be considerably worse. He would need more than Jesus on his side. This would be a "war" that America could not win.

Stock up on petrol now...

[Colapop]

So was Hitler - but it didn't stop a nation from blindly following him until the opposition totally crushed the country. The American gubbermint is slightly more wealthy and a whole lot more dangerous. They come up with really good ideas all the time...
"Ooo a fire lets pore some petrol on it and see what happens." -
"Shit that's hot!!" -
"Ow fuck we got burned" -
"We'll nuke the fucker that'll teach it!!"

Not all Americans are like that, but certainly the politicians are.

[Timber020]

Hitler was a decorated war vetran, at least he has some cred. And the german people had been in really bad times with the promise of better ones (Haha), where as the american people are in the opposite situation.
Oh and Hitler had a mostache! And one ball more than the president!
I doubt that even the rednecks that make up most of the US military would be ready to follow Bush on this one.

[James Deuce]

So was Hitler .......

That's an excuse to appease the German postwar zeitgeist guilt complex.

[kickingzebra]

Bush is the only politician with balls. Will it come to nukes? I hope not, but as always it is going to be the nut behind the wheel. I doubt USA would fire first. They actually have morals.

[Skyryder]

I first heard this on the news tonight but unfortunately the phone rang and by the time I got back theitem had been and gone. Did a quick search on the net and it appears that Bush has not ruled out any options on weapon deployment and use, should he decide to invade Iraq. from what little I can gather this has more to do with the prevention of Iraq from developing a nuke weapon programme. Iraq has consistantly maintained that nuke programm is for peacfull purposes.

So question
# 1 Who here believes that and Iraq nuke programe is only for peacfull purposes. Well I sure as hell don't. And I'm sure as hell that Bush and his advisors do not either. So failing to prevent Iraq from developing a nuke programm, question

#2 how does the US prevent Iraq from developing a Nuke weapon?

Now here's the rub. Given Bushes bullshit about Saddam Hussains weapons of mass destruction, (he had destroyed them so that there was no chance of the UN weapons inspectors of discovering them) who here believes that Bush will actually use them. Well I fucking well don't. Why should he when he's got the Israielis. These guys have been out of the equation for sometime but make no mistake, they will not allow another middle eastern power to aquire a nuclear arsinal.

Bush is playing a game that we are not privy too. He's considered enough of a looney to prabably get away with it. There's going to be some serious talking that going to paradise is not going to happen if you get vapourised.


Skyryder

[James Deuce]

Bush is the only politician with balls. Will it come to nukes? I hope not, but as always it is going to be the nut behind the wheel. I doubt USA would fire first. They actually have morals.

Bwahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa

The same country who maintained Ford and GM factories in occupied Europe during WWII at the same time as they were at war with Germany????

Bahahahahaaaaa

Bush's family laundered money for Nazi Germany as it began its military expansion in the mid-30s.

The only "moral" the US subscribes to is cold hard cash.

[OMG]

How ironic, to prevent nuclear weapons getting into 'the wrong hands' and make the world a saver place, the only nation in the history of world to use nuclear weapons are threatening to use them again.

[Skyryder]

I doubt USA would fire first. They actually have morals.

What planet have you been on for the last fifty years.

Skyryder

[kickingzebra]

How ironic, all the left leaning woofters come out to play, but they only ever moan or protest... Action is a verb people...

[James Deuce]

#2 how does the US prevent Iraq from developing a Nuke weapon?

They let Israel do their job, and then reward them with a few billion dollars worth of F22s.

[Marmoot]

Not all Americans are like that, but certainly the politicians are.

It is a modern universal truth that in Democratic nation the people does not matter :slap:

Democracy: from Greek δημοκρατία (demokratia), δημος (demos) the common people + κρατειν (kratein) to rule + the suffix ία (ia), literally "the common people rule", adapted to Modern English structure "to rule the common people"