A good argument

**Colapop** · 10th May 2006, 06:52

The wife should have been consulted. If she had a genuine rape fetish, then there could have been a meeting of sorts, say in two rooms separated by a door? (just thinking out loud) All parties are then aware of the participant's agreement to the action.
In this case the husband is as culpable (I think moreso) than the rapists. I can see that they would have been under the impression that she was into it (and role playing) but their actions do not excuse the crime they committed. They committed a despicable act regardless of what the husband led them to believe.

**Squeak the Rat** · 10th May 2006, 08:12

While normally I would argue as hard as possible opposite to the general opinion

:

The husband should have the book thrown at him.

And while I feel a little sorry for the other guys, and while I hate to stick up for "the law", at no point did they obtain her consent, therefore it was rape. The only way that I think you could argue the case would be if there is something in law saying that as they were married the husband was entitled to enter into contracts on behalf of his wife.

I would expect a conviction with a lesser sentence...

**Edbear** · 10th May 2006, 08:18

Throw the book at the three of them! There is never any excuse for rape! Or for fiddling about with another man's wife, even if he wants you to! Her rights as human being have been violated, and as one post said, it would be fairly obvious that she didn't want a part of it.

**ghost** · 10th May 2006, 08:33

Originally Posted by Jantar

Yes, they should be convicted, but because they believed they had consent they should receive the lightest legal penalty. I believe that under British law a husband cannot be convicted of raping his wife. But he can be convicted of conspiracy to cause harm, and as such should receive the maximum penalty.

what he said

Originally Posted by Squeak the Rat

While normally I would argue as hard as possible opposite to the general opinion

:

The husband should have the book thrown at him.

And while I feel a little sorry for the other guys, and while I hate to stick up for "the law", at no point did they obtain her consent, therefore it was rape. The only way that I think you could argue the case would be if there is something in law saying that as they were married the husband was entitled to enter into contracts on behalf of his wife.

I would expect a conviction with a lesser sentence...

And what he said,

All three should be done

**Switch** · 10th May 2006, 08:38

Originally Posted by Edbear

Throw the book at the three of them! There is never any excuse for rape! Or for fiddling about with another man's wife, even if he wants you to! Her rights as human being have been violated, and as one post said, it would be fairly obvious that she didn't want a part of it.

I agree with Edbear. And to think, the wife will be traumatised(sp) for life

**WRT** · 10th May 2006, 09:02

All three should be done. What sort of a man agrees to rape anyone, let alone a friends wife? No amount of cajoling, bribing, or otherwise would convince me to rape, even if the guys wife looked like Angolina Jolie.

Hell, even if the wife asked me to rape her, I wouldnt (couldnt) do it.

Rapists are the scum of the earth. Throw the fking book at them, and the husband - he's even worse. He's done that to someone he took an oath to love and cherish. Does a mans word count for nothing these days?

**MSTRS:Me** · 10th May 2006, 09:52

I have to agree with the others. The 2 'mates' are guilty of rape. And the husband...conspiring to (whatever), fraud, accessory before, during and after the fact. Is 'Possession of fuckwitism' a crime? In which case, that too.

**wendigo** · 10th May 2006, 10:02

Originally Posted by WRT

Hell, even if the wife asked me to rape her, I wouldnt (couldnt) do it.

Might sound pedantic, but surely if she asks you to rape her it is no longer rape.

**WRT** · 10th May 2006, 10:04

Yeah, your right Wendigo, but you know what I mean. If she asked me to rough her up, slap her round a bit and force myself on her while she "resisted" - I aint down for that. Go find some other chump.

**wendigo** · 10th May 2006, 10:25

Originally Posted by WRT

Yeah, your right Wendigo, but you know what I mean. If she asked me to rough her up, slap her round a bit and force myself on her while she "resisted" - I aint down for that. Go find some other chump.

Have to admit stirring another man's custard isn't high on my list of priorities.

**MSTRS:Me** · 10th May 2006, 10:31

Originally Posted by wendigo

Have to admit stirring another man's custard isn't high on my list of priorities.

....or being tapped on the shoulder.

**Smorg** · 10th May 2006, 10:46

Interesting fetish, Hi my names Kate and i often have fantasys of being raped.....What the fuck is up with that.
Stupid mates, fuckwit husband they should all be made to pay. Chuck 'em in prison and tell thier cellmates that they are kiddy fidlers.
That sort of shit is definately not on. Poor woman

**Karma** · 10th May 2006, 10:54

It's all about having no power over your own actions... Some people like big tits, some like being tied up and shagged senseless. Each to their own.

Usually something like this involves a code-word, a saftey barrier if you will, in case the guys take it too far.

They were stupid, that's for sure, but that's all, I don't think they were guilty as such... how many women here yell ' no no no...' when having sex... bit of a personal question I suppose, but in the heat of passion all logic goes out the window.