I'd never thought of it like that, and you have a good point.Originally Posted by Pixie
My "Humane Killing" definition revolves around 3 things:
1) A certain death. "Having a whack" at something is far from certain. You hit it and it runs away pained and suffering... that's the undesirable approach I'm talking about.
Pin the little bugger down (which they did) and giving it good hard smack with a solid instrument (which they did) and the liklihood of it dying increases dramatically.
2) A quick death. What's the point is making death linger? If there's a quick way of dispatching something it should be used. It also minimises the possibility of escape, and the prospect of option 1 (above) kicking in.
3) A painless death. Your post certainly made me think about that one - an angle I'd never considered before. I have to admit my general philosophy hasn't changed at all, but your points are certainly something to think about.
I'll still be trying for a head shot instead of a gut shot, and I'll make sure the hammer is adequate to dispatch possums upon first contact.
MDU
Bookmarks