i've also studied a little bit of law.
what part of the privacy/crimes/summary offences/fish and chip act relates to not taking photos of damaged grass, that just happens to have a picture of someone doing the damaging it in it? especially after warning said person that these photos may be taken, and any such photos may be passed onto a 3rd party?
and it's not that our opinions are different, you are paraphrasing law, we're arguing that you're wrong. you could always point us to the law you are referring to, then if we're wrong, we'll accept it and go away.
Bookmarks