Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: Wtd: The new Shell fuel results (yr 06)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    5th April 2005 - 12:57
    Bike
    In between bikes
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    799

    Question Wtd: The new Shell fuel results (yr 06)

    Okay guys & girls, some of you by now must have burnt a full tank of Shell's new fuel.

    Shell is advertising this new fuel as improving your fuel economy so has it noticeably improved, is there any other behavioural changes or suffered any fuel related problems?

    My bike is still running Shell/BP fuel bought back in early April and it’ll be another month before it’ll get its next fill (I’m cycling much more for exercise ). Even then, it’ll be quite sometime before any results are known

    I’m quite sure a number of us are interested in finding out what we’ve all collectively experienced based upon the original thread, which somehow I can't find back.
    90% of the time spent writing this post was spent thinking of something witty to say. It may have been wasted.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    30th March 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    2001 RC46
    Location
    Norfshaw
    Posts
    10,455
    Blog Entries
    17
    I'm halfway through a tank (although I can't guarantee that the service station didn't have a mix of new/old in its tanks).
    Can't notice any difference, although my first impression was it was worse.
    ... and that's what I think.

    Or summat.


    Or maybe not...

    Dunno really....


  3. #3
    Join Date
    9th August 2005 - 11:21
    Bike
    Suzuki TL1000Sx 98
    Location
    Taranaki
    Posts
    1,048
    I've had 4 fills.. and the first fill, I thought I gained 30kms out of a 17ltr Tank to get 260ks.

    But other fill's, I've had 230k's from a 17ltr tank. (So I'm guessing my Air Filter is filled with oil again - which I'll be checking tomorrow afternoon).

    So nope.. no noticeable improvements from using Shell's new fuel.
    You can't fight sleep.. if you feel tired, stop and rest!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    7th July 2005 - 12:06
    Bike
    .
    Location
    North Shore, Auckland
    Posts
    917
    put a tank of it in the Primera and have got less K's then normal. They did say that you need to try a few tanks before you notice the difference, but I'm not too convinced.
    has anyone noticed that the advert at the stations state that the mixture thats available commercially is not the same mixture that was used for the world record.
    Cibby play thing

  5. #5
    Join Date
    9th February 2003 - 14:34
    Bike
    93 fireblade
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    852
    I believe shell's new advertising campaign is based on the idea that if you bullshit people, they'll be too lazy to actually follow it up and prove you wrong.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    7th April 2006 - 09:17
    Bike
    1986 Suzuki GN250
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    407
    Isn't that what all advertising campaigns are based on?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390
    I Fill up with it, and no differance at all. I must of had 3 tanks by now. As soon as I saw that add on tv, I thought bullshit - just like techron.
    Then I could get a Kb Tshirt, move to Timaru and become a full time crossdressing faggot

  8. #8
    Join Date
    30th March 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    2001 RC46
    Location
    Norfshaw
    Posts
    10,455
    Blog Entries
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by renegade master
    I Fill up with it, and no differance at all. I must of had 3 tanks by now. As soon as I saw that add on tv, I thought bullshit - just like techron.
    The techron is a reputable fuel system cleaner. However, all the fuels have stuff like that in.

    Shell's propaganda actually says:
    "Through a combination of vehicle maintenance, improved driving styles and choosing the right fuel, we’ve shown customers can make a real difference to their own mileage figures."

    Now that's an out, if ever there was one. No guarantees.
    ... and that's what I think.

    Or summat.


    Or maybe not...

    Dunno really....


  9. #9
    Join Date
    24th June 2004 - 17:27
    Bike
    So old you won't care
    Location
    Kapiti
    Posts
    7,879
    Quote Originally Posted by MrMelon
    I believe shell's new advertising campaign is based on the idea that if you bullshit people, they'll be too lazy to actually follow it up and prove you wrong.
    and in the meanwhile, they have all purchased at least 3 or 5 tanks of your fuel and forgotten why....

  10. #10
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    I never go to a particular chain of stations, and never look at the price. I need petrol, they sell it. I just assume all their marketing crap is either lies, or damned lies. Equally, I've never noticed any change in the running of my vehicles from using other brands... even running Challenge back in the day when everyone reckoned (you know, heard it from a mate of a mate) it was better for V8s. I just keep everything tuned right, no problems.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    1st November 2005 - 08:18
    Bike
    F-117.
    Location
    Banana Republic of NZ
    Posts
    7,048
    Quote Originally Posted by Flyingpony
    ...is there any other behavioural changes or suffered any fuel related problems?
    Yes. Less money in wallet for beer and Rum because of the rip-off price of petrol...
    TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”

  12. #12
    I did a thread a couple of weeks back about how I improved my fuel ecconomy by 25%!! - for small fee I'll do the same for you....

  13. #13
    Join Date
    21st August 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    2017 Suzuki Dl1000
    Location
    Picton
    Posts
    5,177
    Last year on a number of long rides i did notice a slight increase in fuel mileage when using Caltex of around 1 km/l. It wasn't enough of a difference to make up for the price difference from using Shell, but over 2 or 3 tanks full it was evident.

    The diffence was only really noticeable on long rides where I would be using at least two tanks of fuel in a single day. Shell would take me 280 - 300 kms before the fuel warning light would come on and Caltex would take me 300 - 320 kms. I expect that the new Shell product will produce similar figures to Caltex.

    I should have more data when I get back into long rides at the end of winter.
    Time to ride

  14. #14
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by imdying
    even running Challenge back in the day when everyone reckoned (you know, heard it from a mate of a mate) it was better for V8s.
    Challenge imported all your fuel so it actually was different to the other big 4!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    I tend to use Caltex and Gull.
    BP is out because they always start each round of price rises, there are no Shell stations on my route and Mobil made my cage run shitty.
    There's scientific reasoning for you.
    Speed doesn't kill people.
    Stupidity kills people.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •