View Poll Results: Is Automatic Braking in an unavoidible collision......

Voters
24. You may not vote on this poll
  • Good

    6 25.00%
  • Bad

    18 75.00%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Good or bad

  1. #1
    Join Date
    7th November 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Aquired by locals
    Location
    Groote Eylandt
    Posts
    6,606

    Good or bad

    http://www.clipjunkie.com/Crash-prev...car-vid38.html

    Good or bad Idea? I wouldnt mind seeing this implemented in a few of our rentals
    To every man upon this earth
    Death cometh sooner or late
    And how can a man die better
    Than facing fearful odds
    For the ashes of his fathers
    And the temples of his Gods

  2. #2
    Join Date
    7th July 2005 - 12:00
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    2,460
    I couldn't be bothered to watch the vid... but I personally prefer to swerve rather than emergency brake.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    18th December 2004 - 08:09
    Bike
    Triumph Tiger
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,086
    Seems like a good idea but I have reservations. I know they say it only does it when collision unavoidable but Murphy taught us that things dont always go to plan.

    "If you can't laugh at yourself, you're just not paying attention!"
    "There is no limit to dumb."

    "Resolve to live with all your might while you do live, and as you shall wish you had done ten thousand years hence."

  4. #4
    Join Date
    23rd November 2003 - 20:12
    Bike
    R80, CB400N, Cb200.
    Location
    Northcote, Auckland
    Posts
    1,398
    Interesting to say the least.
    Quote Originally Posted by John Banks View Post
    Yes, but bikes = cool and cars = suck. I think it's Newton's fourth law or something.
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Dover View Post
    Queer Retarded Fags I think.

    Isn't sniper one of those?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    5th January 2006 - 16:36
    Bike
    2007, Kawasaki Z750 (L)
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    734
    It would be brilliant when it kicks in while you're overtaking a truck or another large vehicle and there is a car coming towards you..... oh hang on I think I meant disastrous... Of course it will all depend on the software design of the system, etc....

    A little tip for all you air travellers,

    recently they held a conference for software engineers of aircraft cockpit systems in america somewhere (can't remember the city...) for aircraft cockpit system software engineers from all over the world. Just to make a point, as a part of the opening statement for the conference, the organiser (the lead speaker or whatever you want to call him...) asked everyone that flew to the conference to raise their hands, - very very few people did, and as I understand most software engineers involved in cockpit systems wouldn't fly unless they absolutely have to and then they would try not to....

    Makes pilots like me feel really good about what I do. Lucky everything I fly at the moment is levers and cables....
    I have deep pockets. It's just that it's a deep empty pocket...........

  6. #6
    Join Date
    21st June 2005 - 20:11
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    1,929
    You have a choice, smash through a few cardboard boxes or get nailed by the mack truck barreling up behind you. Car senses a collision and stops. Mack truck runs over you.





    FUCK THAT

  7. #7
    Join Date
    4th July 2005 - 15:58
    Bike
    Apriliaaah!
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,609
    Not to mention people will come to rely on it. Still wont save you from a side impact after blowing through a stop sign.

    How about instead of spending heaps of money on making cars idiot proof (cause lets face it, someone is just gonna come up with a bigger idiot) why not invest that money into driver training?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    British technology? Mercs have had this for a while now.
    Just another step towards the driverless car.
    Speed doesn't kill people.
    Stupidity kills people.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390
    Computers in cars? what ever will they think up next.

    Instead of all this "idiot proof" stuff they cram into those tin boxes on wheels, why not just increase the price (both in terms of money time AND skill) of our licence system. at the same time, only issue traffic offence tickets (bar dangerours, drink drive etc) IF they cause an accident? It would go a long way to get public support for the coppars.
    Then I could get a Kb Tshirt, move to Timaru and become a full time crossdressing faggot

  10. #10
    Join Date
    23rd November 2003 - 20:12
    Bike
    R80, CB400N, Cb200.
    Location
    Northcote, Auckland
    Posts
    1,398
    You mean education instead of enforcement? You're dreeeeaming mate.
    Quote Originally Posted by John Banks View Post
    Yes, but bikes = cool and cars = suck. I think it's Newton's fourth law or something.
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Dover View Post
    Queer Retarded Fags I think.

    Isn't sniper one of those?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    5th June 2005 - 14:36
    Bike
    1999 ZX9-ARRH
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by Magua
    You mean education instead of enforcement? You're dreeeeaming mate.

    haha for sure, this is New Zealand everyone has an uninformed opinion

  12. #12
    Join Date
    2nd February 2006 - 16:24
    Bike
    01 - ZX7R
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    443
    one more thing to go wrong with a vehicle.

    I am a firm believe in cars that a fully mechanical. driver aids are for people that cant drive.

    people should just get better at driving - the more computer controlled stuff that goes on the worse people will be when it comes to 'crunch' time.

    until it gets to minority report style stuff where you dont actually have to touch ANYTHING - cars should respond exactly how the driver EXPECTS it to.
    gone.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    24th August 2005 - 02:38
    Bike
    '06 Honda Fartblood
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    845
    "Design a system that even an idiot can use and only an idiot will want to use it"

    BTW: Did you see the test for the system? 100 metres of straight road and then a parked car... who is going to need a system to stop them in this situation???
    "Jee, whiz... I was pottering along in a straight line and didn't see the car in front"
    Then you should not be driving in the first place...
    Don't make cars for dumbasses - There should be a skill prerequisite.
    Keep it rubber-side down...

  14. #14
    Join Date
    24th January 2005 - 15:45
    Bike
    2022 Suzuki GSX250R
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    2,209
    Quote Originally Posted by Lazy7
    people should just get better at driving - the more computer controlled stuff that goes on the worse people will be when it comes to 'crunch' time.
    Like people who rely on calculators to do maths and computers to correct their spelling and grammar or use a thesaurus without comprehendinging enough of the language to appreciate nuances in the "synonyms".

    When it boils down to it, they are the ones who walk away with fifty cents change after tendering a ten dollar note for three $1 cream buns and a $2 pie because they trust that the sleep-deprived bugger behind the counter keyed it in right and lack the maths skills to have at least a ballpark figure of how much their purchases should cost and how much change they should get back or think that "he drew his gun and lapidated his enemy" would make an interesting change from "he drew his gun and killed his enemy".

    Make things too automatic and stop people from relying on their own brains and skills and they'll all be ripe candidates for some Orwellian nightmare where the populace is totally reliant on the government to supply the things that do things for them and the threat of having to think for themselves for once or actually exercise a skill will be enough to make them acquiesce to whatever the government demands.

    Honestly, if people can't be arsed learning how to do things that everyone should be able to do without completing a doctorate in the subject and expect everything to be make simple and automated, they do not deserve to be classified as the same species that crawled painfully to the top of the food chain and the place of dominant life form.
    Motorbike Camping for the win!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    9th June 2005 - 21:19
    Bike
    Daytona 675
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    710
    Quote Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
    Just another step towards the driverless car.
    Driverless now, you just point them in the direction you want and hope...
    Auto breaks? So what!
    A modern car has anti lock breaks, traction control, electronic steering, computer controlled suspension, cruse control, fly by wire throttle, (developing by wire breaks) memory for your radio station, seat position, and climate control settings set in your key.
    Most have optional navigation systems that talk to you and the phone will auto mute the radio for you too.
    All this and smart air bags, pre tensioner seatbelts, side intrusion bars and high tech collapsible impact absorption panels…
    The list goes on, just try and find a manual transmission!
    The most dangerous thing in the car is the driver, when they remove it the roads will be safe for all!
    And we will have to find more inventive ways to control the population.
    We all have our little obsessions...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •