Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 39

Thread: HP and BTU question

  1. #1
    Join Date
    7th September 2004 - 10:00
    Bike
    A Krappisaki Tractor
    Location
    South
    Posts
    941

    HP and BTU question

    Ok, given a fuel flow rate of 36.68lb/hr I want to calculate the btu/hr and from that the final hp. I'm expecting a number above 77hp but dont seem to get it.

    Anyone have an ideal formula to do it ?



    Biggest problem I am having is finding correct values for btu of petrol and a formula that actually works.
    The contents of this post are my opinion and may not be subjected to any form of reality
    It means I'm not an authority or a teacher, and may not have any experience so take things with a pinch of salt (a.k.a bullshit) rather than fact

  2. #2
    Join Date
    3rd June 2005 - 23:06
    Bike
    nun
    Location
    In cloud cookoo land
    Posts
    4,834
    Forty Two..


    :slap:

  3. #3
    Join Date
    4th January 2005 - 18:50
    Bike
    Massey ferguson 7495 dyna-vt
    Location
    Norfland
    Posts
    6,917
    Quote Originally Posted by TwoSeven
    Ok, given a fuel flow rate of 36.68lb/hr I want to calculate the btu/hr and from that the final hp. I'm expecting a number above 77hp but dont seem to get it.

    Anyone have an ideal formula to do it ?



    Biggest problem I am having is finding correct values for btu of petrol and a formula that actually works.
    depends sooo much on the efficiency of the engine....bettr to track down a HP rate using cfm of air flowed....as your engine is real just an air pump....not a fuel burner....


    ps: why do you want to know this....it seems very much like fairy bullshit to me...
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    Given the short comings of my riding style, it doesn't matter what I'm riding till I've got my shit in one sock.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    7th September 2004 - 10:00
    Bike
    A Krappisaki Tractor
    Location
    South
    Posts
    941
    If you want v.e use 0.85 and if you need airflow, just assume 12.5:1 mix. - but those are not important to the formula, just modifiers.

    I need the energy of the fuel in brake mean HP, hence the question
    The contents of this post are my opinion and may not be subjected to any form of reality
    It means I'm not an authority or a teacher, and may not have any experience so take things with a pinch of salt (a.k.a bullshit) rather than fact

  5. #5
    Join Date
    4th January 2005 - 18:50
    Bike
    Massey ferguson 7495 dyna-vt
    Location
    Norfland
    Posts
    6,917
    Quote Originally Posted by TwoSeven
    I need the energy of the fuel in brake mean HP, hence the question
    thats why I think it fairy bullshit for you asking....how efficient is your engine??? theres a massive difference between a OHV briggs and stratton and lambourghini V12....theres forces to drive....weight of engine parts....thick-ness of the oil...abient temp....shit loads of variables....

    the end result is your gunna get a figure which is meaning-less !!! their will be different hp figures for two engines coming off the producton line next to each other...
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    Given the short comings of my riding style, it doesn't matter what I'm riding till I've got my shit in one sock.

  6. #6
    When I was a 2nd year apprentice I sat in a cold prefab in St Pauls St on tuesday nights and did calculations about btu's - I didn't have a clue what it was about then,nor do I now.But I remember a gallon of petrol weighs 1 lb,that was the only easy bit.....

  7. #7
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Uh, treacherous thing, memory, isn't it , as we get older.

    The calorific value of petrol (no idea what octane etc) is about 19000 BTU per pound weight, if that's any help.

    However , the conversion from BTU/hr to watts is 0.2931. Which would give a figure of about 272 hp. Which sounds rather optimistic?
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  8. #8
    Join Date
    5th January 2006 - 16:36
    Bike
    2007, Kawasaki Z750 (L)
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    734
    Quote Originally Posted by Motu
    When I was a 2nd year apprentice I sat in a cold prefab in St Pauls St on tuesday nights and did calculations about btu's - I didn't have a clue what it was about then,nor do I now.But I remember a gallon of petrol weighs 1 lb,that was the only easy bit.....
    Uhhhh a US gal of fuel weighs about 5.99lbs.. and british gallon isn't that much smaller....
    I have deep pockets. It's just that it's a deep empty pocket...........

  9. #9
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Quote Originally Posted by bobsmith
    Uhhhh a US gal of fuel weighs about 5.99lbs.. and british gallon isn't that much smaller....
    Imperial gallon is bigger than US one. 4.5 litres versus 4 litres roughly. Yanks are behind the times, in 1766 they opted to stick with the obsolete Winchester measurerments , instead of the later London ones.

    A gallon (Imp) of water weighs ten pound. Petrol is lighter but not that much lighter. About 7 lb, roughly.
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  10. #10
    Join Date
    4th January 2006 - 19:30
    Bike
    2011 Kawasaki ZX-14 "Monster"
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    3,293
    Quote Originally Posted by boomer
    Forty Two..
    by that, I gather you have recently watched the Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
    There's nothing more exhilarating than pointing out the shortcomings of others, is there? -Clerks

  11. #11
    Join Date
    5th January 2006 - 16:36
    Bike
    2007, Kawasaki Z750 (L)
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    734
    Quote Originally Posted by Ixion
    Imperial gallon is bigger than US one. 4.5 litres versus 4 litres roughly. Yanks are behind the times, in 1766 they opted to stick with the obsolete Winchester measurerments , instead of the later London ones.
    I say the americans and the brits are both fucking slow. the rest of europe knew that the metric is the only way to go... I can't believe seeing american textbooks that has values for things like gravitational acceleration and specific mass of water in imperical units.... Oh and the unit of mass is pounds and the unit of force is.... oh also pounds... WTF!!!!!!!!!
    I have deep pockets. It's just that it's a deep empty pocket...........

  12. #12
    Join Date
    5th January 2006 - 16:36
    Bike
    2007, Kawasaki Z750 (L)
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    734
    Ok so I just looked up all the constants and:

    Specific gravity of vehicle petrol = 737.22kg/m^3 = 0.73722kg/Litre
    1 Imperical gallon = 4.54609188 litre
    1 Kg = 2.20462262 pound

    so:

    1 Imperical gallon of fuel is:

    4.546 * 0.737 * 2.2 = 7.4 lb (2s.f)

    right... now everyone can go to sleep now...
    I have deep pockets. It's just that it's a deep empty pocket...........

  13. #13
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Metrichumbug. Woz the deal with a system where everythings a kilosummit. What's wrong with ells and firkins and leagues and minims and perches anyway. Rot set in when they made us give up our real money and settle for this danged funny money. Never bought as much. Petrol used to be 3/4d a gallon then. Look at it now, all on account of meddling with the money and measures.
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  14. #14
    The USA has actualy signed up for Systems International (suposed to be in French,but can't be arsed tooking it up) so in theory they are as metric as any other country in the world.But they will never force their populace to change to metric,that old free will thing again.They like having that last Imperial yoke apon their shoulders.Good grief...seven sixtyfourths and three thirthyseconds...talk about making it hard for yourself....

  15. #15
    Join Date
    5th January 2006 - 16:36
    Bike
    2007, Kawasaki Z750 (L)
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    734
    it is strange though, I thought they would at least publish their textbooks in metric if they are indeed supposed to be going SI
    I have deep pockets. It's just that it's a deep empty pocket...........

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •