Can the old-school 929 take it to a bike with motoGP technology and lots of other marketing bullshit thrown at it?
I had the pleasure of riding my mate's 2004 CBR1K back to back with my 929 yesterday, and here's how I reckon they compare...
The bikes:
2001 CBR 929: Suspension Tech front fork upgrade, braided brake lines, 2Bro's full system exhaust, PC3, aftermarket footpegs (slightly higher ground clearance than stock, but still a joke), running Michelin Pilot Powers.
2004 CBR1K: Full Yoshi system, everything else stock, running Metzeler Racetecs.
The Engines:
Firstly, this CBR1K with the Full Yoshi system is one of the best sounding street bikes I've heard. It sounds quiet and just a little menacing at idle, and every blip of the throttle unleashes a very angry, raspy, deep bark.
Given the sound of it, I was expecting armageddon when I got on it and opened up...nope! It was so unbelievably smooth! Smoother than my 929 and it doesn't even have a PC3 to help it deal with the new exhaust. Just like all of the reviews have said, it really is a bit underwhelming when you first get on. This is partly due to the throttle having a seemingly very long travel, but also 'cos there's just no steps in the power curve. It's only when you look down at the speedo that you realise you're on a CBR1000, and not a CBR250 with extra wind noise option as you were led to believe.
My 929 in comparison feels quicker, even though it's not. To be honest, this is mostly because of the aftermarket exhaust, which is loud and makes it pick up a lot more in the mid-range and top end. The stock package was almost as deceptive in building speed as the CBR1K. 2nd and 3rd gears, it doesn't feel like there's much in it. However, beyond 220, the 929 would get stomped, owing, I believe, to the lack of ram air.
So, CBR1K probably wins in the engine department, being smoother and a bit more powerful. It's a nice package, but then the 929 never had a killer engine in the first place, so I wasn't expecting an upset for my bike here.
Brakes:
I found the CBR1K to be quite disappointing here. Lots of power, but stuff all feel. Maybe I've just been spoilt by the braided lines on the 929, which allow extremely precise control of the front brakes. On the 929, I can brake hard in the wet, drag the brakes in to a corner or dab them at a decent lean angle to help it transition from one side to the other better, all in complete confidence. Plenty of power in the 929 brakes too.
I'd give the decision on brakes to my 929, but only 'cos I cheated and put braided lines on. The '04 CBR1K is pretty average in this department compared to newer bikes...a 636 for example, would shit on it. Apparently the '06 CBR1K is a bit better.
Handling:
Again a bit of cheating here 'cos my bike's got uprated forks. The bikes are really quite different in the way they do things in the first place anyway...
The 929 is a short arse bike. It's got a low seat height, low ground clearance, and from all of this, a low centre of gravity really. This makes it very good for a litre bike in the tight, tight stuff. Side to side transitions are a breeze, and it hung on to MR's Ohlins'd-out R6 pretty well on the Coro.
The CBR1K is comparatively very high, which took a few corners to get used to. It turns in pretty quickly, though not quite as quick as the 929. It took bumps pretty well, despite my mate having it set pretty hard. I was especially impressed with the electronic damper, which made 200km/h bumps that shake the 929's head a little just disappear. The 1K held a line really well, and was quite happy to respond to a desire to change your line through use of the throttle.
Basically I found the 1K competent in this department, but I didn't really like it. The whole expereince just felt a little more vague than I'm used to on my current or previous bikes. I could make the thing go fast around a corner (as fast as I'd allow myself on a mate's bike), and the eyes were telling me that everything was looking good, but the ass, legs and hands were searching for some feedback on what the hell's going on at ground level.
Maybe this was due to the different tyres, or the damper, or just the fact that I'm used to my bike...? I'm not sure, but I just couldn't connect with it in the way I like.
For outright potential, I'm pretty sure that the CBR1K has it all over the 929. On Puke, my money would be on the CBR1K for sure. It'd eat the bumpy sweeper with its stability, and wouldn't run out of lean angle everywhere like the 929. On Taupo short track, I might actually back the 929. The CBR is just a bit more cumbersome than I'd like. On the road...I think I'd still go the 929, unless I lived somewhere that the roads were in particularly shit condition and there was heaps of long, fast corners.
Looks:
Who cares...
Ok then, CBR1K in grey/black with no rear fender and Yoshi RS-5 sticking out the back has it in the looks department in my opinion...but it's still got some weird angles going on. I think that the 954 was some seriously sexy looking beast, and Honda took a step back with the 1K.
Conclusion:
The 1K is a nice bike. At the start, I was expecting to ride it, and then feel like my bike is an inferior piece of shit in comparison. Instead, I came off of the 1K feeling a bit underwhelmed, a bit numb even. Once back on my bike, it felt a bit 'agricultural' (no offence Poos), a bit old-tech, but a lot more involved, and a lot more fun.
The 04/05 CBR1K almost certainly won't be my next bike. The '06 is supposed to be a big improvement (many publications which rated the old model CBR1K last, rated the '06 near the top of the pile...Superbike mag and www.motorcycleusa.com for example), so maybe that has a chance to keep me in the Honda camp.
More likely though, if I stay in the litre bike market, I'll be jumping back to the Kawasaki camp, and putting my life on the line with an 04/05 10R, if there's any that haven't been high-sided when I come to buy next yearGo Ninja!!
Bookmarks